1999The William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository (William & Mary)Open access

Waiver of the Right to Appeal Sentencing in Plea Agreements with the Federal Government

David E. Carney

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

During the summer of 1997, the Department of Justice issued a directive requiring all future federal plea agreements to include language providing that a defendant waive her statutory right to appeal the sentence imposed by a judge' guaranteed by the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 (the "Act"). 2 Various agreements in several federal jurisdictions previously had used similar waiver language on an ad hoc basis.'Twice during the summer of 1997, the issue arose in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.4 Although several circuits have deemed the waiver acceptable, 5 Judges Paul L. Friedman and Harold H. Greene ruled in separate hearings that the U.S. Attorney's office could not include such a condition in any plea agreement.6 Though the U.S. Attorney's office subsequently withdrew the language and proceeded contrary to the Department of Justice 1. See United States v. Raynor, 989 F

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

During the summer of 1997, the Department of Justice issued a directive requiring all future federal plea agreements to include language providing that a defendant waive her statutory right to appeal the sentence imposed by a judge' guaranteed by the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 (the "Act"). 2 Various agreements in several federal jurisdictions previously had used similar waiver language on an ad hoc basis.'Twice during the summer of 1997, the issue arose in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.4 Although several circuits have deemed the waiver acceptable, 5 Judges Paul L. Friedman and Harold H. Greene ruled in separate hearings that the U.S. Attorney's office could not include such a condition in any plea agreement.6 Though the U.S. Attorney's office subsequently withdrew the language and proceeded contrary to the Department of Justice 1. See United States v. Raynor, 989 F

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

During the summer of 1997, the Department of Justice issued a directive requiring all future federal plea agreements to include language providing that a defendant waive her statutory right to appeal the sentence imposed by a judge' guaranteed by the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 (the "Act"). 2 Various agreements in several federal jurisdictions previously had used similar waiver language on an ad hoc basis.'Twice during the summer of 1997, the issue arose in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.4 Although several circuits have deemed the waiver acceptable, 5 Judges Paul L. Friedman and Harold H. Greene ruled in separate hearings that the U.S. Attorney's office could not include such a condition in any plea agreement.6 Though the U.S. Attorney's office subsequently withdrew the language and proceeded contrary to the Department of Justice 1. See United States v. Raynor, 989 F

Key concepts: Waiver, Plea, Law, Appeal, Statute, Political science, Supreme court, Adjudication

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Waiver of the Right to Appeal Sentencing in Plea Agreements with the Federal Government — Research Paper | ScholarLens