1974Unpublished venueRequires access

Evaluation of Three Mosquito Repellent Screening Methods.

Charles F. Brodel, Thomas S. Spencer, William A. Akers

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract : Sweat-off, dry protection, and wash-off screening methods were evaluated on man based on their capacity to rank the four best repellents presently available for efficacy against the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti (L.). DEET (N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide), dimethyl phthalate, 6-12 (2-ethyl-1, 3 e-hexanediol), and Indalone (3,4-dihydro-2,2-dimethyl-4-oxo-2H-pyran-6-carboxylic acid butyl ester) were applied directly to the forearms using a new four-site test design. DEET protected significantly longer than the others under dry conditions. Two trials of the wash-off method showed DEET and dimethyl phthalate to be equally effective; 6-12 and Indalone were less effective but not separable. On an overall basis, DEET was judged the most effective. (Modified author abstract)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : Sweat-off, dry protection, and wash-off screening methods were evaluated on man based on their capacity to rank the four best repellents presently available for efficacy against the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti (L.). DEET (N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide), dimethyl phthalate, 6-12 (2-ethyl-1, 3 e-hexanediol), and Indalone (3,4-dihydro-2,2-dimethyl-4-oxo-2H-pyran-6-carboxylic acid butyl ester) were applied directly to the forearms using a new four-site test design. DEET protected significantly longer than the others under dry conditions. Two trials of the wash-off method showed DEET and dimethyl phthalate to be equally effective; 6-12 and Indalone were less effective but not separable. On an overall basis, DEET was judged the most effective. (Modified author abstract)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : Sweat-off, dry protection, and wash-off screening methods were evaluated on man based on their capacity to rank the four best repellents presently available for efficacy against the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti (L.). DEET (N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide), dimethyl phthalate, 6-12 (2-ethyl-1, 3 e-hexanediol), and Indalone (3,4-dihydro-2,2-dimethyl-4-oxo-2H-pyran-6-carboxylic acid butyl ester) were applied directly to the forearms using a new four-site test design. DEET protected significantly longer than the others under dry conditions. Two trials of the wash-off method showed DEET and dimethyl phthalate to be equally effective; 6-12 and Indalone were less effective but not separable. On an overall basis, DEET was judged the most effective. (Modified author abstract)

Key concepts: DEET, Dimethyl phthalate, Aedes aegypti, Insect repellent, Diethyl phthalate, Toxicology, Phthalate, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Three Mosquito Repellent Screening Methods. — Research Paper | ScholarLens