2016Unpublished venueRequires access

The Role of Extralegal Factors in Jury Verdicts

Marilyn Chandler Ford

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Jury verdicts may not always be based on legally relevant evidence. A variety of extralegal factors may intrude in jury decision making. This article reviews the literature on individual juror characteristics, trial processes, and group dynamics that may bias jury verdicts. It is con cluded that while some extralegal effects are evident, on the whole American juries perform remarkably well. Two already established procedures, the voir dire and judicial instructions, are discussed as means to mitigate the influence of extralegal factors on jury verdicts.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Jury verdicts may not always be based on legally relevant evidence. A variety of extralegal factors may intrude in jury decision making. This article reviews the literature on individual juror characteristics, trial processes, and group dynamics that may bias jury verdicts. It is con cluded that while some extralegal effects are evident, on the whole American juries perform remarkably well. Two already established procedures, the voir dire and judicial instructions, are discussed as means to mitigate the influence of extralegal factors on jury verdicts.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Jury verdicts may not always be based on legally relevant evidence. A variety of extralegal factors may intrude in jury decision making. This article reviews the literature on individual juror characteristics, trial processes, and group dynamics that may bias jury verdicts. It is con cluded that while some extralegal effects are evident, on the whole American juries perform remarkably well. Two already established procedures, the voir dire and judicial instructions, are discussed as means to mitigate the influence of extralegal factors on jury verdicts.

Key concepts: Jury, Hung jury, Psychology, Jury instructions, Variety (cybernetics), Jury selection, Social psychology, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Role of Extralegal Factors in Jury Verdicts — Research Paper | ScholarLens