The Role of Extralegal Factors in Jury Verdicts
Marilyn Chandler Ford
Abstract
Marilyn Chandler Ford
Abstract
Jury verdicts may not always be based on legally relevant evidence. A variety of extralegal factors may intrude in jury decision making. This article reviews the literature on individual juror characteristics, trial processes, and group dynamics that may bias jury verdicts. It is con cluded that while some extralegal effects are evident, on the whole American juries perform remarkably well. Two already established procedures, the voir dire and judicial instructions, are discussed as means to mitigate the influence of extralegal factors on jury verdicts.
OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Jury verdicts may not always be based on legally relevant evidence. A variety of extralegal factors may intrude in jury decision making. This article reviews the literature on individual juror characteristics, trial processes, and group dynamics that may bias jury verdicts. It is con cluded that while some extralegal effects are evident, on the whole American juries perform remarkably well. Two already established procedures, the voir dire and judicial instructions, are discussed as means to mitigate the influence of extralegal factors on jury verdicts.
Key concepts: Jury, Hung jury, Psychology, Jury instructions, Variety (cybernetics), Jury selection, Social psychology, Political science