2017•Unpublished venueRequires access

Battle of Lateralisms: Intellectual Property and Trade

Robert P. Merges

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) carried on its administrative functions under the treaties, and has accumulated a large staff in Geneva, a primary function of which is to spread the virtues of intellectual property to the developing world. Intellectual property rights have their own history, institutional structure and constituencies; furthermore, they may involve greater conceptual complexity than many trade issues. Primarily bilateral negotiations have been successful because the United States (US) is able to place intellectual property rights in a larger trade context. The US has negotiated one-on-one with three country groups or countries: the newly industrialized countries (NICs), the less developed countries (LDCs), and Japan. Many LDCs continue to resist the expansion of patent protection. The Japanese patent system is often used as an example of non-tariff barriers employed by Japan. US-Japanese intellectual property negotiations are complicated by the complexities of the legal issues involved.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) carried on its administrative functions under the treaties, and has accumulated a large staff in Geneva, a primary function of which is to spread the virtues of intellectual property to the developing world. Intellectual property rights have their own history, institutional structure and constituencies; furthermore, they may involve greater conceptual complexity than many trade issues. Primarily bilateral negotiations have been successful because the United States (US) is able to place intellectual property rights in a larger trade context. The US has negotiated one-on-one with three country groups or countries: the newly industrialized countries (NICs), the less developed countries (LDCs), and Japan. Many LDCs continue to resist the expansion of patent protection. The Japanese patent system is often used as an example of non-tariff barriers employed by Japan. US-Japanese intellectual property negotiations are complicated by the complexities of the legal issues involved.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) carried on its administrative functions under the treaties, and has accumulated a large staff in Geneva, a primary function of which is to spread the virtues of intellectual property to the developing world. Intellectual property rights have their own history, institutional structure and constituencies; furthermore, they may involve greater conceptual complexity than many trade issues. Primarily bilateral negotiations have been successful because the United States (US) is able to place intellectual property rights in a larger trade context. The US has negotiated one-on-one with three country groups or countries: the newly industrialized countries (NICs), the less developed countries (LDCs), and Japan. Many LDCs continue to resist the expansion of patent protection. The Japanese patent system is often used as an example of non-tariff barriers employed by Japan. US-Japanese intellectual property negotiations are complicated by the complexities of the legal issues involved.

Key concepts: Battle, Intellectual property, Property (philosophy), Computer science, History, Philosophy, Ancient history, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Battle of Lateralisms: Intellectual Property and Trade — Research Paper | ScholarLens