2006PubMedRequires access

[Inhibition of histamine-induced wheel after a recommended single dose administration of 10 mg cetirizine, 5 mg desloratadine, 120 i 180 mg fexofenadine, 5 mg levocetirizine and 10 mg loratadine--a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial].

Jerzy Kruszewski, Kajetan Klos, K Sułek

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the effect of inhibition skin reactivity after administration of single dose administration of various second generation antihistamines in the healthy people group. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty two healthy subjects (aged 22+/-18 years) were randomized into seven groups which received orally: cetirizine 10 mg, loratadine 10 mg, desloratadine 5 mg, levocetirizine 5 mg, fexofenadne 120 mg and 180 mg, or placebo respectively. The skin microcirculation reaction after 10 mg/ml histamine administration was estimated visually on the forearm (diameter of wheal and flare) and by Laser Doppler flowmetry before and after study drug or placebo administration prior and, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24 h and one time daily every next 9 days. RESULTS: There were significant differences of histamine-induced wheal, flare and skin blood flow inhibition vs baseline and placebo after drug administration. There were different dyr'mmics in suppression effect after histamine-induced skin reactivity in various drug groups. The overall inhibitory potency was statistically higher for cetirizine, levocetirizine and fexofenadine (even 95% ve basline) as compared to loratadine and desloratadine (even 65% vs basline). Different times of retreated inhibition effect after administered drugs were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The study drugs shown significant different dynamics of skin reaction inhibition vs baseline and placebo. There were observed strongest effect after levocetirizine and cetirizine and next order after fexofenadine, desloratadine and loratadine.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the effect of inhibition skin reactivity after administration of single dose administration of various second generation antihistamines in the healthy people group. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty two healthy subjects (aged 22+/-18 years) were randomized into seven groups which received orally: cetirizine 10 mg, loratadine 10 mg, desloratadine 5 mg, levocetirizine 5 mg, fexofenadne 120 mg and 180 mg, or placebo respectively. The skin microcirculation reaction after 10 mg/ml histamine administration was estimated visually on the forearm (diameter of wheal and flare) and by Laser Doppler flowmetry before and after study drug or placebo administration prior and, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24 h and one time daily every next 9 days. RESULTS: There were significant differences of histamine-induced wheal, flare and skin blood flow inhibition vs baseline and placebo after drug administration. There were different dyr'mmics in suppression effect after histamine-induced skin reactivity in various drug groups. The overall inhibitory potency was statistically higher for cetirizine, levocetirizine and fexofenadine (even 95% ve basline) as compared to loratadine and desloratadine (even 65% vs basline). Different times of retreated inhibition effect after administered drugs were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The study drugs shown significant different dynamics of skin reaction inhibition vs baseline and placebo. There were observed strongest effect after levocetirizine and cetirizine and next order after fexofenadine, desloratadine and loratadine.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the effect of inhibition skin reactivity after administration of single dose administration of various second generation antihistamines in the healthy people group. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty two healthy subjects (aged 22+/-18 years) were randomized into seven groups which received orally: cetirizine 10 mg, loratadine 10 mg, desloratadine 5 mg, levocetirizine 5 mg, fexofenadne 120 mg and 180 mg, or placebo respectively. The skin microcirculation reaction after 10 mg/ml histamine administration was estimated visually on the forearm (diameter of wheal and flare) and by Laser Doppler flowmetry before and after study drug or placebo administration prior and, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24 h and one time daily every next 9 days. RESULTS: There were significant differences of histamine-induced wheal, flare and skin blood flow inhibition vs baseline and placebo after drug administration. There were different dyr'mmics in suppression effect after histamine-induced skin reactivity in various drug groups. The overall inhibitory potency was statistically higher for cetirizine, levocetirizine and fexofenadine (even 95% ve basline) as compared to loratadine and desloratadine (even 65% vs basline). Different times of retreated inhibition effect after administered drugs were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The study drugs shown significant different dynamics of skin reaction inhibition vs baseline and placebo. There were observed strongest effect after levocetirizine and cetirizine and next order after fexofenadine, desloratadine and loratadine.

Key concepts: Loratadine, Desloratadine, Fexofenadine, Cetirizine, Levocetirizine, Medicine, Pharmacology, Placebo

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Inhibition of histamine-induced wheel after a recommended single dose administration of 10 mg cetirizine, 5 mg desloratadine, 120 i 180 mg fexofenadine, 5 mg levocetirizine and 10 mg loratadine--a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens