2011•Ecquid Novi African Journalism StudiesRequires access

The present is another country: A comment on the 2010 media freedom debate

Peter D. McDonald

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

The spectre of apartheid censorship haunted the 2010 debates about media freedom. While acknowledging the force of the historical parallel, this article takes issue with the polemical use of the past in this context, arguing that the more pressing issues raised by the Protection of Information Bill and proposed Media Appeals Tribunal need to be seen against the background of the post-apartheid legislative framework and the African National Congress's own changing attitudes to the print media since 1994. The article concludes with some reflections on the relationship between the rights to freedom of expression and human dignity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The spectre of apartheid censorship haunted the 2010 debates about media freedom. While acknowledging the force of the historical parallel, this article takes issue with the polemical use of the past in this context, arguing that the more pressing issues raised by the Protection of Information Bill and proposed Media Appeals Tribunal need to be seen against the background of the post-apartheid legislative framework and the African National Congress's own changing attitudes to the print media since 1994. The article concludes with some reflections on the relationship between the rights to freedom of expression and human dignity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The spectre of apartheid censorship haunted the 2010 debates about media freedom. While acknowledging the force of the historical parallel, this article takes issue with the polemical use of the past in this context, arguing that the more pressing issues raised by the Protection of Information Bill and proposed Media Appeals Tribunal need to be seen against the background of the post-apartheid legislative framework and the African National Congress's own changing attitudes to the print media since 1994. The article concludes with some reflections on the relationship between the rights to freedom of expression and human dignity.

Key concepts: Dignity, Freedom of expression, Censorship, Freedom of the press, Tribunal, Context (archaeology), Legislature, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The present is another country: A comment on the 2010 media freedom debate — Research Paper | ScholarLens