2003•bepress Legal RepositoryOpen access

The Anonymous Accused: Protecting Defendants' Rights in High-Profile Criminal Cases

Jaime N Morris

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

The public's interest in high-profile crimes and the media's coverage of high-profile trials have significantly increased over the past. fifty years, raising significant concerns about a high-profile defendant's right to a fair trial. This Note examines how pretrial publicity can affect the fairness of a high-profile criminal case and how courts have attempted to protect a high-profile defendant's Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial while still assuring the media's First Amendment right to freedom of the press. Specifically, the Note discusses and analyzes court made remedies as well as new remedies scholars have proposed to protect a high-profile criminal defendant's right to a fair trial. Finding such remedies ineffective, the Note considers whether defendant anonymity, which courts can apply in civil trials, could be an effective protection of a high-profile defendant's right to a fair trial.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The public's interest in high-profile crimes and the media's coverage of high-profile trials have significantly increased over the past. fifty years, raising significant concerns about a high-profile defendant's right to a fair trial. This Note examines how pretrial publicity can affect the fairness of a high-profile criminal case and how courts have attempted to protect a high-profile defendant's Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial while still assuring the media's First Amendment right to freedom of the press. Specifically, the Note discusses and analyzes court made remedies as well as new remedies scholars have proposed to protect a high-profile criminal defendant's right to a fair trial. Finding such remedies ineffective, the Note considers whether defendant anonymity, which courts can apply in civil trials, could be an effective protection of a high-profile defendant's right to a fair trial.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The public's interest in high-profile crimes and the media's coverage of high-profile trials have significantly increased over the past. fifty years, raising significant concerns about a high-profile defendant's right to a fair trial. This Note examines how pretrial publicity can affect the fairness of a high-profile criminal case and how courts have attempted to protect a high-profile defendant's Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial while still assuring the media's First Amendment right to freedom of the press. Specifically, the Note discusses and analyzes court made remedies as well as new remedies scholars have proposed to protect a high-profile criminal defendant's right to a fair trial. Finding such remedies ineffective, the Note considers whether defendant anonymity, which courts can apply in civil trials, could be an effective protection of a high-profile defendant's right to a fair trial.

Key concepts: Fair trial, Publicity, Right to a fair trial, Law, Anonymity, Criminal trial, Freedom of the press, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Anonymous Accused: Protecting Defendants' Rights in High-Profile Criminal Cases — Research Paper | ScholarLens