1992•Very Large Data BasesRequires access

Random Sampling from Pseudo-Ranked B+ Trees

Gennady Antoshenkov

Open publisher page 35 citations

Abstract

In the past, two basic approaches for sampling f5-om B+ trees have been suggested: sampling from the ranked trees and acceptance/rejection sampling i?om non-ranked trees. The first approach requires the entire root-to-leaf path to be updated with each insertion and deletion. The second has no update overhead, but incurs a high rejection rate for the compressed-key B+ trees commonly used in practice. In this paper we introduce a new sampling method based on pseudo-ranked B+ trees, which are B+ trees supplemented with information loosely describing the estimated rank limits. This new method exhibits a very small rejection rate while paying only a marginal cost of the tree update overhead. We also present comparative efficiency measurements of different methods that were run on production databases and on several prototype workload simulations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the past, two basic approaches for sampling f5-om B+ trees have been suggested: sampling from the ranked trees and acceptance/rejection sampling i?om non-ranked trees. The first approach requires the entire root-to-leaf path to be updated with each insertion and deletion. The second has no update overhead, but incurs a high rejection rate for the compressed-key B+ trees commonly used in practice. In this paper we introduce a new sampling method based on pseudo-ranked B+ trees, which are B+ trees supplemented with information loosely describing the estimated rank limits. This new method exhibits a very small rejection rate while paying only a marginal cost of the tree update overhead. We also present comparative efficiency measurements of different methods that were run on production databases and on several prototype workload simulations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the past, two basic approaches for sampling f5-om B+ trees have been suggested: sampling from the ranked trees and acceptance/rejection sampling i?om non-ranked trees. The first approach requires the entire root-to-leaf path to be updated with each insertion and deletion. The second has no update overhead, but incurs a high rejection rate for the compressed-key B+ trees commonly used in practice. In this paper we introduce a new sampling method based on pseudo-ranked B+ trees, which are B+ trees supplemented with information loosely describing the estimated rank limits. This new method exhibits a very small rejection rate while paying only a marginal cost of the tree update overhead. We also present comparative efficiency measurements of different methods that were run on production databases and on several prototype workload simulations.

Key concepts: Sampling (signal processing), Overhead (engineering), Tree (set theory), Computer science, Statistics, B-tree, Rejection sampling, Rank (graph theory)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Random Sampling from Pseudo-Ranked B+ Trees — Research Paper | ScholarLens