2006ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)Open access

Time Is Right to Revise the Texas Insanity Defense: An Essay

Brian D. Shannon

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

In light of three Texas cases involving Andrea Yates, Deanna Laney, and Dena Schlosser, this essay discusses the Texas insanity defense and its application. It sets forth a brief history of the Texas insanity defense, discusses some legislative fine-tuning accomplished in 2005, and proposes and analyzes several alternative options that would, if enacted, modernize the Texas insanity defense so that it could better comport with modern medical science and become a useful tool in the Texas criminal justice system. In addition, a more modern or appropriate test for insanity would provide meaningful guidance to prosecutors in ascertaining whether to pursue a prosecution in a particular case or, instead, be more amenable to agreeing to an insanity finding.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In light of three Texas cases involving Andrea Yates, Deanna Laney, and Dena Schlosser, this essay discusses the Texas insanity defense and its application. It sets forth a brief history of the Texas insanity defense, discusses some legislative fine-tuning accomplished in 2005, and proposes and analyzes several alternative options that would, if enacted, modernize the Texas insanity defense so that it could better comport with modern medical science and become a useful tool in the Texas criminal justice system. In addition, a more modern or appropriate test for insanity would provide meaningful guidance to prosecutors in ascertaining whether to pursue a prosecution in a particular case or, instead, be more amenable to agreeing to an insanity finding.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In light of three Texas cases involving Andrea Yates, Deanna Laney, and Dena Schlosser, this essay discusses the Texas insanity defense and its application. It sets forth a brief history of the Texas insanity defense, discusses some legislative fine-tuning accomplished in 2005, and proposes and analyzes several alternative options that would, if enacted, modernize the Texas insanity defense so that it could better comport with modern medical science and become a useful tool in the Texas criminal justice system. In addition, a more modern or appropriate test for insanity would provide meaningful guidance to prosecutors in ascertaining whether to pursue a prosecution in a particular case or, instead, be more amenable to agreeing to an insanity finding.

Key concepts: Insanity, Insanity defense, Legislature, Criminal justice, Test (biology), Political science, Law, Legislative history

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Time Is Right to Revise the Texas Insanity Defense: An Essay — Research Paper | ScholarLens