1987Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

The transformation of American industry in the interwar period

Michael A. Bernstein

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

There was abundant capital in the country and a mass of unemployed labor. But the markets on which they had of late depended … were overworked and overstocked … and capital and labor wanted “a new channel.” – Benjamin Disraeli, Earl of Beaconsfield In macroeconomic terms, the impact of the Great Depression on the United States is well known. From the stock market collapse in late 1929 until the middle of the thirties, the physical output of goods and services contracted by 33%. Almost 25% of the labor force was idled. Capital accumulation came to a standstill – one investigator has even reported a negative rate of net investment for the decade 1929–39. This broad outline of the nation's worst economic misfortune has been the focus of almost all the theoretical and historical work done on the depression. Despite the large amount of aggregate data that has been examined, there remain many unanswered questions concerning the course of the Great Depression in the United States. The differential effects of the slump on regions, on industries, and on classes of income recipients are but a few of the missing parts in the received scenario. Moreover, little attention has been paid to the experience of particular industries.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There was abundant capital in the country and a mass of unemployed labor. But the markets on which they had of late depended … were overworked and overstocked … and capital and labor wanted “a new channel.” – Benjamin Disraeli, Earl of Beaconsfield In macroeconomic terms, the impact of the Great Depression on the United States is well known. From the stock market collapse in late 1929 until the middle of the thirties, the physical output of goods and services contracted by 33%. Almost 25% of the labor force was idled. Capital accumulation came to a standstill – one investigator has even reported a negative rate of net investment for the decade 1929–39. This broad outline of the nation's worst economic misfortune has been the focus of almost all the theoretical and historical work done on the depression. Despite the large amount of aggregate data that has been examined, there remain many unanswered questions concerning the course of the Great Depression in the United States. The differential effects of the slump on regions, on industries, and on classes of income recipients are but a few of the missing parts in the received scenario. Moreover, little attention has been paid to the experience of particular industries.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There was abundant capital in the country and a mass of unemployed labor. But the markets on which they had of late depended … were overworked and overstocked … and capital and labor wanted “a new channel.” – Benjamin Disraeli, Earl of Beaconsfield In macroeconomic terms, the impact of the Great Depression on the United States is well known. From the stock market collapse in late 1929 until the middle of the thirties, the physical output of goods and services contracted by 33%. Almost 25% of the labor force was idled. Capital accumulation came to a standstill – one investigator has even reported a negative rate of net investment for the decade 1929–39. This broad outline of the nation's worst economic misfortune has been the focus of almost all the theoretical and historical work done on the depression. Despite the large amount of aggregate data that has been examined, there remain many unanswered questions concerning the course of the Great Depression in the United States. The differential effects of the slump on regions, on industries, and on classes of income recipients are but a few of the missing parts in the received scenario. Moreover, little attention has been paid to the experience of particular industries.

Key concepts: Period (music), Interwar period, Transformation (genetics), History, Economic history, Political science, Ancient history, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The transformation of American industry in the interwar period — Research Paper | ScholarLens