2005PubMedRequires access

Radiation-induced DNA-damage and gene expression profiles in human lung cancer cells with different radiosensitivity.

Björn Hellman, David Brodin, Maria Andersson, Karin Dahlman‐Wright, Ulf Isacsson, Daniel Brattström, Michael Bergqvist

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Measurements of DNA double strand breaks and their subsequent repair after in vitro irradiation has been suggested to be an alternative way of monitoring radiotherapeutic response. METHODS: In the present study, the DNA repair kinetics (using a neutral version of the Comet assay) up to 45 min after a single dose of 2 Gy was studied as well as the gene expression profiles, before and 45 min after the irradiation, in two human lung cancer cell lines with different radiosensitivity (U-1285 and U-1810). RESULTS: Immediately after the irradiation, both cell lines responded with increased levels of DNA damage. However, the induced damage was slightly higher in U-1810 (known to be radioresistant) than in U-1285 (known to be radiosensitive), and the latter cell line also seemed to have a slightly more efficient DNA-repair. The two different lung cancer cell lines were highly heterogeneous in gene expression, both before and after the irradiation, and there was no obvious relationship between the Comet data and the microarray data. CONCLUSION: Given the fact that U-1810 has been classified as radioresistant and U-1285 as radiosensitive in clonogenic assays, the results of the present study indicate that radiation-induced DNA double strand breaks and DNA-repair efficiency are poor indicators of the intrinsic radiosensitivity of human lung cancer cells irradiated with a single dose in vitro.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Measurements of DNA double strand breaks and their subsequent repair after in vitro irradiation has been suggested to be an alternative way of monitoring radiotherapeutic response. METHODS: In the present study, the DNA repair kinetics (using a neutral version of the Comet assay) up to 45 min after a single dose of 2 Gy was studied as well as the gene expression profiles, before and 45 min after the irradiation, in two human lung cancer cell lines with different radiosensitivity (U-1285 and U-1810). RESULTS: Immediately after the irradiation, both cell lines responded with increased levels of DNA damage. However, the induced damage was slightly higher in U-1810 (known to be radioresistant) than in U-1285 (known to be radiosensitive), and the latter cell line also seemed to have a slightly more efficient DNA-repair. The two different lung cancer cell lines were highly heterogeneous in gene expression, both before and after the irradiation, and there was no obvious relationship between the Comet data and the microarray data. CONCLUSION: Given the fact that U-1810 has been classified as radioresistant and U-1285 as radiosensitive in clonogenic assays, the results of the present study indicate that radiation-induced DNA double strand breaks and DNA-repair efficiency are poor indicators of the intrinsic radiosensitivity of human lung cancer cells irradiated with a single dose in vitro.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Measurements of DNA double strand breaks and their subsequent repair after in vitro irradiation has been suggested to be an alternative way of monitoring radiotherapeutic response. METHODS: In the present study, the DNA repair kinetics (using a neutral version of the Comet assay) up to 45 min after a single dose of 2 Gy was studied as well as the gene expression profiles, before and 45 min after the irradiation, in two human lung cancer cell lines with different radiosensitivity (U-1285 and U-1810). RESULTS: Immediately after the irradiation, both cell lines responded with increased levels of DNA damage. However, the induced damage was slightly higher in U-1810 (known to be radioresistant) than in U-1285 (known to be radiosensitive), and the latter cell line also seemed to have a slightly more efficient DNA-repair. The two different lung cancer cell lines were highly heterogeneous in gene expression, both before and after the irradiation, and there was no obvious relationship between the Comet data and the microarray data. CONCLUSION: Given the fact that U-1810 has been classified as radioresistant and U-1285 as radiosensitive in clonogenic assays, the results of the present study indicate that radiation-induced DNA double strand breaks and DNA-repair efficiency are poor indicators of the intrinsic radiosensitivity of human lung cancer cells irradiated with a single dose in vitro.

Key concepts: Radiosensitivity, Radioresistance, Comet assay, DNA damage, Clonogenic assay, DNA repair, Molecular biology, DNA

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Radiation-induced DNA-damage and gene expression profiles in human lung cancer cells with different radiosensitivity. — Research Paper | ScholarLens