2004•PubMedRequires access

[Central giant cell granuloma and osteitis fibrosa cystica of hyperparathyroidism. A challenge in differential diagnosis of patients with osteolytic jawbone lesions and a history of cancer].

Michael Wolf Thorwarth, Stephan Rupprecht, Andreas Schlegel, Daniel Neureiter, P. Keßler

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Giant cell lesions of the bone present similar histological features. The differential diagnosis comprises central giant cell granuloma, giant cell tumor of bone, and osteitis fibrosa cystica (brown tumor) in combination with hyperparathyroidism. Since these lesions may mimic metastatic bone disease in patients with a history of cancer, a malignant process has to be considered. Since the treatment and prognosis of these entities-benign versus malignant osteolytic bone processes-differ greatly, definitive differential diagnosis is of utmost importance. CASE REPORT: Two patients presenting with osteolytic lesions of the maxilla are reported here. In both cases a history of cancer (breast and prostate) suggested bone spreading of these malignant tumors. The clinical and histological findings were similar in both patients. One lesion was diagnosed as central giant cell granuloma, the other was found to be brown tumour in osteitis fibrosa cystica as an initial manifestation of hyperparathyroidism. DISCUSSION: The presented cases demonstrate the difficulties in establishing the correct diagnosis of patients found to have osteolytic lesions of the jawbones which is critical for the appropriate management of these patients. The article discusses the different entities of osteolytic lesions of the jawbones and the necessary diagnostic and therapeutic approach.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Giant cell lesions of the bone present similar histological features. The differential diagnosis comprises central giant cell granuloma, giant cell tumor of bone, and osteitis fibrosa cystica (brown tumor) in combination with hyperparathyroidism. Since these lesions may mimic metastatic bone disease in patients with a history of cancer, a malignant process has to be considered. Since the treatment and prognosis of these entities-benign versus malignant osteolytic bone processes-differ greatly, definitive differential diagnosis is of utmost importance. CASE REPORT: Two patients presenting with osteolytic lesions of the maxilla are reported here. In both cases a history of cancer (breast and prostate) suggested bone spreading of these malignant tumors. The clinical and histological findings were similar in both patients. One lesion was diagnosed as central giant cell granuloma, the other was found to be brown tumour in osteitis fibrosa cystica as an initial manifestation of hyperparathyroidism. DISCUSSION: The presented cases demonstrate the difficulties in establishing the correct diagnosis of patients found to have osteolytic lesions of the jawbones which is critical for the appropriate management of these patients. The article discusses the different entities of osteolytic lesions of the jawbones and the necessary diagnostic and therapeutic approach.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Giant cell lesions of the bone present similar histological features. The differential diagnosis comprises central giant cell granuloma, giant cell tumor of bone, and osteitis fibrosa cystica (brown tumor) in combination with hyperparathyroidism. Since these lesions may mimic metastatic bone disease in patients with a history of cancer, a malignant process has to be considered. Since the treatment and prognosis of these entities-benign versus malignant osteolytic bone processes-differ greatly, definitive differential diagnosis is of utmost importance. CASE REPORT: Two patients presenting with osteolytic lesions of the maxilla are reported here. In both cases a history of cancer (breast and prostate) suggested bone spreading of these malignant tumors. The clinical and histological findings were similar in both patients. One lesion was diagnosed as central giant cell granuloma, the other was found to be brown tumour in osteitis fibrosa cystica as an initial manifestation of hyperparathyroidism. DISCUSSION: The presented cases demonstrate the difficulties in establishing the correct diagnosis of patients found to have osteolytic lesions of the jawbones which is critical for the appropriate management of these patients. The article discusses the different entities of osteolytic lesions of the jawbones and the necessary diagnostic and therapeutic approach.

Key concepts: Osteitis fibrosa cystica, Medicine, Differential diagnosis, Giant cell, Brown tumor, Osteitis, Hyperparathyroidism, Central giant-cell granuloma

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Central giant cell granuloma and osteitis fibrosa cystica of hyperparathyroidism. A challenge in differential diagnosis of patients with osteolytic jawbone lesions and a history of cancer]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens