1979Land EconomicsRequires access

An Analysis of Participation in Nonconsumptive Wildlife Recreation

Michael J. M. Hay, Kenneth E. McConnell

Open publisher page 92 citations

Abstract

One of the roles of recreation economics in public policy is to demonstrate the magnitude and economic value of outdoor activities which do not register their importance through market transactions. In pursuing this research, economists can now argue the economic value of harvesting wildlife stocks for recreation purposes; for example, salmon fishing (Brown et al. 1965), duck hunting (Hammack and Brown 1974), and deer hunting (Gum and Martin 1975). There has been relative neglect of the nonconsumptive uses of wildlife such as bird-watching, wildlife watching, and wildlife photography. The impact of public policy on wildlife abundance and nonconsumptive wildlife recreation is determined by the responsiveness of users to changes in publicly controlled natural resources, such as habitat and stocks of wildlife. The purpose of this paper is to contribute to an understanding of the nature and quantity of nonconsumptive wildlife recreation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

One of the roles of recreation economics in public policy is to demonstrate the magnitude and economic value of outdoor activities which do not register their importance through market transactions. In pursuing this research, economists can now argue the economic value of harvesting wildlife stocks for recreation purposes; for example, salmon fishing (Brown et al. 1965), duck hunting (Hammack and Brown 1974), and deer hunting (Gum and Martin 1975). There has been relative neglect of the nonconsumptive uses of wildlife such as bird-watching, wildlife watching, and wildlife photography. The impact of public policy on wildlife abundance and nonconsumptive wildlife recreation is determined by the responsiveness of users to changes in publicly controlled natural resources, such as habitat and stocks of wildlife. The purpose of this paper is to contribute to an understanding of the nature and quantity of nonconsumptive wildlife recreation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 92 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

One of the roles of recreation economics in public policy is to demonstrate the magnitude and economic value of outdoor activities which do not register their importance through market transactions. In pursuing this research, economists can now argue the economic value of harvesting wildlife stocks for recreation purposes; for example, salmon fishing (Brown et al. 1965), duck hunting (Hammack and Brown 1974), and deer hunting (Gum and Martin 1975). There has been relative neglect of the nonconsumptive uses of wildlife such as bird-watching, wildlife watching, and wildlife photography. The impact of public policy on wildlife abundance and nonconsumptive wildlife recreation is determined by the responsiveness of users to changes in publicly controlled natural resources, such as habitat and stocks of wildlife. The purpose of this paper is to contribute to an understanding of the nature and quantity of nonconsumptive wildlife recreation.

Key concepts: Recreation, Wildlife, Business, Advertising, Geography, Political science, Biology, Ecology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An Analysis of Participation in Nonconsumptive Wildlife Recreation — Research Paper | ScholarLens