2012UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam)Open access

Polish dictionaries and the treatment of verbal aspect

René Genis

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

In good dictionaries of Slavic languages verbal aspect is generally indicated in the same way as the gender of nouns: (usually) labels or such like provide the information whether a verb is perfective or imperfective and especially nowadays also whether two verbs with the same lexical meaning that differ only in aspect form a so-called aspectual pair. This state of affairs does not actually do justice to the many significant but often ‘regular’ variations that occur in association with aspect. In particular, with respect to imperfective verbs, there are a - albeit, not so great - number of meaning variations that may be seen to systematically occur depending on the lexical meaning of verbs in combination with aspectual meaning. The question is whether that should be pointed out in a dictionary. In order to shed some light on this matter I will give an overview of the treatment of aspect by (all) Polish monolingual dictionaries whilst sometimes sidestepping to special issues appertaining to bi-lingual dictionaries. This overview demonstrates how the strategies for dealing with aspect have shifted over time, we might indeed say, have developed. Relying on simple markers for aspect, such as is the case with most dictionaries, may not actually provide the full picture of usage of respective aspectual partners and dictionary makers might consider an extension to their treatment, such as I suggest.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In good dictionaries of Slavic languages verbal aspect is generally indicated in the same way as the gender of nouns: (usually) labels or such like provide the information whether a verb is perfective or imperfective and especially nowadays also whether two verbs with the same lexical meaning that differ only in aspect form a so-called aspectual pair. This state of affairs does not actually do justice to the many significant but often ‘regular’ variations that occur in association with aspect. In particular, with respect to imperfective verbs, there are a - albeit, not so great - number of meaning variations that may be seen to systematically occur depending on the lexical meaning of verbs in combination with aspectual meaning. The question is whether that should be pointed out in a dictionary. In order to shed some light on this matter I will give an overview of the treatment of aspect by (all) Polish monolingual dictionaries whilst sometimes sidestepping to special issues appertaining to bi-lingual dictionaries. This overview demonstrates how the strategies for dealing with aspect have shifted over time, we might indeed say, have developed. Relying on simple markers for aspect, such as is the case with most dictionaries, may not actually provide the full picture of usage of respective aspectual partners and dictionary makers might consider an extension to their treatment, such as I suggest.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In good dictionaries of Slavic languages verbal aspect is generally indicated in the same way as the gender of nouns: (usually) labels or such like provide the information whether a verb is perfective or imperfective and especially nowadays also whether two verbs with the same lexical meaning that differ only in aspect form a so-called aspectual pair. This state of affairs does not actually do justice to the many significant but often ‘regular’ variations that occur in association with aspect. In particular, with respect to imperfective verbs, there are a - albeit, not so great - number of meaning variations that may be seen to systematically occur depending on the lexical meaning of verbs in combination with aspectual meaning. The question is whether that should be pointed out in a dictionary. In order to shed some light on this matter I will give an overview of the treatment of aspect by (all) Polish monolingual dictionaries whilst sometimes sidestepping to special issues appertaining to bi-lingual dictionaries. This overview demonstrates how the strategies for dealing with aspect have shifted over time, we might indeed say, have developed. Relying on simple markers for aspect, such as is the case with most dictionaries, may not actually provide the full picture of usage of respective aspectual partners and dictionary makers might consider an extension to their treatment, such as I suggest.

Key concepts: Linguistics, Meaning (existential), Verb, Noun, Lexical item, Slavic languages, Grammatical category, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Polish dictionaries and the treatment of verbal aspect — Research Paper | ScholarLens