1980•Unpublished venueRequires access

Depositional Environments of the Mississippian Redwall Limestone in Northeastern Arizona

Walter Kent, Richard R. Rawson

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Facies analysis of the Redwall Limestone suggests two major transgressive sequences in northeastern Arizona. The first major transgression of the sea spread slowly from the west and was followed by a rapid regression. The second major transgression consisted of three rapid transgressions in northeastern Arizona separated by relatively slow partial regressions caused by prograding sedimentation. Facies geometry of the first transgression best fits the Shaw-Irwin model of epeiric deposition with well-developed transgressive and regressive facies whereas the second transgression best fits Coogan’s asymmetrical model of epeiric deposition with poorly developed transgressive facies. Textural analysis of the Redwall Limestone to determine facies relations and depositional environments included differentiation of the carbonate grain types into the following textural rock types: dolomite, stromatolitic wackestone, pisolitic wackestone, calcispheric packstone, pelletal packstone, oolitic packstone and grainstone, foraminiferal grainstone, crinoidal grainstone and packstone. These textural rock types may be grouped into four depositional facies: Facies I, crinoidal packstone–open marine; Facies II, crinoidal and foraminiferal grainstone–open “intratidal”; Facies III, oolitic grainstone and packstone, and pelletal packstone–protected “intratidal”; Facies IV, algal (calcispheres, stromatolites, pisolites) packstone and wackestones and dolomite–supratidal.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Facies analysis of the Redwall Limestone suggests two major transgressive sequences in northeastern Arizona. The first major transgression of the sea spread slowly from the west and was followed by a rapid regression. The second major transgression consisted of three rapid transgressions in northeastern Arizona separated by relatively slow partial regressions caused by prograding sedimentation. Facies geometry of the first transgression best fits the Shaw-Irwin model of epeiric deposition with well-developed transgressive and regressive facies whereas the second transgression best fits Coogan’s asymmetrical model of epeiric deposition with poorly developed transgressive facies. Textural analysis of the Redwall Limestone to determine facies relations and depositional environments included differentiation of the carbonate grain types into the following textural rock types: dolomite, stromatolitic wackestone, pisolitic wackestone, calcispheric packstone, pelletal packstone, oolitic packstone and grainstone, foraminiferal grainstone, crinoidal grainstone and packstone. These textural rock types may be grouped into four depositional facies: Facies I, crinoidal packstone–open marine; Facies II, crinoidal and foraminiferal grainstone–open “intratidal”; Facies III, oolitic grainstone and packstone, and pelletal packstone–protected “intratidal”; Facies IV, algal (calcispheres, stromatolites, pisolites) packstone and wackestones and dolomite–supratidal.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Facies analysis of the Redwall Limestone suggests two major transgressive sequences in northeastern Arizona. The first major transgression of the sea spread slowly from the west and was followed by a rapid regression. The second major transgression consisted of three rapid transgressions in northeastern Arizona separated by relatively slow partial regressions caused by prograding sedimentation. Facies geometry of the first transgression best fits the Shaw-Irwin model of epeiric deposition with well-developed transgressive and regressive facies whereas the second transgression best fits Coogan’s asymmetrical model of epeiric deposition with poorly developed transgressive facies. Textural analysis of the Redwall Limestone to determine facies relations and depositional environments included differentiation of the carbonate grain types into the following textural rock types: dolomite, stromatolitic wackestone, pisolitic wackestone, calcispheric packstone, pelletal packstone, oolitic packstone and grainstone, foraminiferal grainstone, crinoidal grainstone and packstone. These textural rock types may be grouped into four depositional facies: Facies I, crinoidal packstone–open marine; Facies II, crinoidal and foraminiferal grainstone–open “intratidal”; Facies III, oolitic grainstone and packstone, and pelletal packstone–protected “intratidal”; Facies IV, algal (calcispheres, stromatolites, pisolites) packstone and wackestones and dolomite–supratidal.

Key concepts: Grainstone, Wackestone, Facies, Geology, Marine transgression, Sedimentary depositional environment, Paleontology, Transgressive

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Depositional Environments of the Mississippian Redwall Limestone in Northeastern Arizona — Research Paper | ScholarLens