2012Unpublished venueRequires access

Rationalising occupational rights in leasehold law

Mark Pawlowski

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

With the advent of the Bruton personal and the increasingly blurred distinctions between the contractual licence, tenancy at will and tenancy at sufferance, the article argues for a more rational scheme of occupational rights in leasehold law.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

With the advent of the Bruton personal and the increasingly blurred distinctions between the contractual licence, tenancy at will and tenancy at sufferance, the article argues for a more rational scheme of occupational rights in leasehold law.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

With the advent of the Bruton personal and the increasingly blurred distinctions between the contractual licence, tenancy at will and tenancy at sufferance, the article argues for a more rational scheme of occupational rights in leasehold law.

Key concepts: Leasehold estate, Law, Law and economics, Business, Economics, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rationalising occupational rights in leasehold law — Research Paper | ScholarLens