Copyright Law and the Myth of Objectivity: The Idea-Expression Dichotomy and the Inevitability of Artistic Value Judgments
Amy B. Cohen
Abstract
Open-access reader
Amy B. Cohen
Abstract
Open-access reader
On July 12, 1989, the House of Representatives voted to cut the amount it had appropriated for 1990 for the National Endowment for the Arts ("NEA").'The reduction was made in order to express, congressional disapproval of two projects which the NEA had previously funded: the photography of Robert Mapplethorpe, whose work was criticized for its homoerotic and sexual content
OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
On July 12, 1989, the House of Representatives voted to cut the amount it had appropriated for 1990 for the National Endowment for the Arts ("NEA").'The reduction was made in order to express, congressional disapproval of two projects which the NEA had previously funded: the photography of Robert Mapplethorpe, whose work was criticized for its homoerotic and sexual content
Key concepts: Objectivity (philosophy), Value (mathematics), Mythology, Copyright law, Expression (computer science), Statute, Law, Copyright infringement