2010•Journal Of Clinical PeriodontologyRequires access

The association between selected risk indicators and severity of peri-implantitis using mixed model analyses

Odd Carsten Koldsland, Anne Aamdal Scheie, Anne Merete Aass

Open publisher page 137 citations

Abstract

AIM: The aim of the study was to assess possible risk indicators for peri-implantitis at different levels of severity using multi-level analyses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and nine subjects attended the examination, 69 females and 40 males. Mean time of implants in function was 8.4 years (standard deviation 4.6) (subject level). The participants were examined clinically and radiographically. Information regarding general health and habits was gathered, with special emphasis on smoking, oral hygiene and susceptibility to periodontitis. The relation between possible risk indicators and the following features were assessed: • Detectable peri-implantitis: detectable radiographic bone loss (>0.4 mm) and inflammation • Overt peri-implantitis: radiographic peri-implant bone loss 2.0 mm and bleeding on probing /suppuration at pocket probing depth 4 mm. RESULTS: Multi-level statistical analyses identified location in the maxilla as risk indicator for detectable peri-implantitis. Regarding overt peri-implantitis, gender (male) and history of periodontitis were identified as risk indicators. CONCLUSION: Individuals with a history of periodontitis were prone to peri-implantitis, peri-implant bone loss ≥ 2.0 mm and overt in the present study. No association was found between smoking and peri-implant disease in the present study population.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: The aim of the study was to assess possible risk indicators for peri-implantitis at different levels of severity using multi-level analyses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and nine subjects attended the examination, 69 females and 40 males. Mean time of implants in function was 8.4 years (standard deviation 4.6) (subject level). The participants were examined clinically and radiographically. Information regarding general health and habits was gathered, with special emphasis on smoking, oral hygiene and susceptibility to periodontitis. The relation between possible risk indicators and the following features were assessed: • Detectable peri-implantitis: detectable radiographic bone loss (>0.4 mm) and inflammation • Overt peri-implantitis: radiographic peri-implant bone loss 2.0 mm and bleeding on probing /suppuration at pocket probing depth 4 mm. RESULTS: Multi-level statistical analyses identified location in the maxilla as risk indicator for detectable peri-implantitis. Regarding overt peri-implantitis, gender (male) and history of periodontitis were identified as risk indicators. CONCLUSION: Individuals with a history of periodontitis were prone to peri-implantitis, peri-implant bone loss ≥ 2.0 mm and overt in the present study. No association was found between smoking and peri-implant disease in the present study population.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 137 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: The aim of the study was to assess possible risk indicators for peri-implantitis at different levels of severity using multi-level analyses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and nine subjects attended the examination, 69 females and 40 males. Mean time of implants in function was 8.4 years (standard deviation 4.6) (subject level). The participants were examined clinically and radiographically. Information regarding general health and habits was gathered, with special emphasis on smoking, oral hygiene and susceptibility to periodontitis. The relation between possible risk indicators and the following features were assessed: • Detectable peri-implantitis: detectable radiographic bone loss (>0.4 mm) and inflammation • Overt peri-implantitis: radiographic peri-implant bone loss 2.0 mm and bleeding on probing /suppuration at pocket probing depth 4 mm. RESULTS: Multi-level statistical analyses identified location in the maxilla as risk indicator for detectable peri-implantitis. Regarding overt peri-implantitis, gender (male) and history of periodontitis were identified as risk indicators. CONCLUSION: Individuals with a history of periodontitis were prone to peri-implantitis, peri-implant bone loss ≥ 2.0 mm and overt in the present study. No association was found between smoking and peri-implant disease in the present study population.

Key concepts: Peri-implantitis, Medicine, Periodontitis, Dentistry, Bleeding on probing, Oral hygiene, Implant, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The association between selected risk indicators and severity of peri-implantitis using mixed model analyses — Research Paper | ScholarLens