2004DigitalCommons-Macalester (Macalester College)Open access

Rawls’s Theory of Justice From A Utilitarian Perspective

Tony Rogers

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

I am very attracted to the theory Rawls has put forth in A Theory of Justice. I feel that he gives a good explanation of how principles of justice can to be arrived at in order to have a fair and just society. However, I do not think that Rawls’s way of doing this is the only way. In many ways, it seems that utilitarianism can be used to justify the same principles that Rawls is advocating. Specifically, it seems that his notion of the veil of ignorance is just a tool used to decide principles in an essentially utilitarian manner. So, for the purpose of this paper, I will note the similarities between Rawls’s notion of the veil of ignorance and utilitarianism, and I will argue that by using this concept, Rawls is really advocating a kind of utilitarian reasoning.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

I am very attracted to the theory Rawls has put forth in A Theory of Justice. I feel that he gives a good explanation of how principles of justice can to be arrived at in order to have a fair and just society. However, I do not think that Rawls’s way of doing this is the only way. In many ways, it seems that utilitarianism can be used to justify the same principles that Rawls is advocating. Specifically, it seems that his notion of the veil of ignorance is just a tool used to decide principles in an essentially utilitarian manner. So, for the purpose of this paper, I will note the similarities between Rawls’s notion of the veil of ignorance and utilitarianism, and I will argue that by using this concept, Rawls is really advocating a kind of utilitarian reasoning.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

I am very attracted to the theory Rawls has put forth in A Theory of Justice. I feel that he gives a good explanation of how principles of justice can to be arrived at in order to have a fair and just society. However, I do not think that Rawls’s way of doing this is the only way. In many ways, it seems that utilitarianism can be used to justify the same principles that Rawls is advocating. Specifically, it seems that his notion of the veil of ignorance is just a tool used to decide principles in an essentially utilitarian manner. So, for the purpose of this paper, I will note the similarities between Rawls’s notion of the veil of ignorance and utilitarianism, and I will argue that by using this concept, Rawls is really advocating a kind of utilitarian reasoning.

Key concepts: Economic Justice, Perspective (graphical), Epistemology, Primary goods, Sociology, Ethical theory, Philosophy, Environmental ethics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rawls’s Theory of Justice From A Utilitarian Perspective — Research Paper | ScholarLens