2015•Unpublished venueRequires access

Effect of selection operator on NSGA-III in single, multi, and many-objective optimization

Haitham Seada, Kalyanmoy Deb

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

Decomposition-based elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-III) is a recently proposed many-objective optimization algorithm that uses multiple pre-defined yet adaptable reference directions to maintain diversity among its solutions. Designing to solve specifically many-objective problems having four or more objectives, the authors of NSGA-III restricted the population size to be equal to the number of chosen reference directions. This restriction hinders the usage of NSGA-III to single-objective optimization problems, where, by definition, there is only one reference direction. For this reason, a unified algorithm - U-NSGA-III - has been recently proposed to handle this issue. U-NSGA-III is capable of adapting automatically to the dimensionality of the problem in hand through its niching based selection operator. However, the authors of U-NSGA-III abided by this single-fold restriction in all NSGA-III simulations of their study. In this paper we test the possibility of ignoring this restriction of NSGA-III and use multiple population folds to solve single, multi and many-objective problems. Simulations are performed on a variety of constrained and unconstrained single, multi and many-objective problems for this purpose. The strengths and weaknesses of multi-fold NSGA-III compared to those of U-NSGA-III are thoroughly investigated here. The robustness of NSGA-III in each type of problems is also discussed. This study provides a more comprehensive evaluation of the original NSGA-III procedure, which seems to have a wider scope than the original study had foreseen.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Decomposition-based elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-III) is a recently proposed many-objective optimization algorithm that uses multiple pre-defined yet adaptable reference directions to maintain diversity among its solutions. Designing to solve specifically many-objective problems having four or more objectives, the authors of NSGA-III restricted the population size to be equal to the number of chosen reference directions. This restriction hinders the usage of NSGA-III to single-objective optimization problems, where, by definition, there is only one reference direction. For this reason, a unified algorithm - U-NSGA-III - has been recently proposed to handle this issue. U-NSGA-III is capable of adapting automatically to the dimensionality of the problem in hand through its niching based selection operator. However, the authors of U-NSGA-III abided by this single-fold restriction in all NSGA-III simulations of their study. In this paper we test the possibility of ignoring this restriction of NSGA-III and use multiple population folds to solve single, multi and many-objective problems. Simulations are performed on a variety of constrained and unconstrained single, multi and many-objective problems for this purpose. The strengths and weaknesses of multi-fold NSGA-III compared to those of U-NSGA-III are thoroughly investigated here. The robustness of NSGA-III in each type of problems is also discussed. This study provides a more comprehensive evaluation of the original NSGA-III procedure, which seems to have a wider scope than the original study had foreseen.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Decomposition-based elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-III) is a recently proposed many-objective optimization algorithm that uses multiple pre-defined yet adaptable reference directions to maintain diversity among its solutions. Designing to solve specifically many-objective problems having four or more objectives, the authors of NSGA-III restricted the population size to be equal to the number of chosen reference directions. This restriction hinders the usage of NSGA-III to single-objective optimization problems, where, by definition, there is only one reference direction. For this reason, a unified algorithm - U-NSGA-III - has been recently proposed to handle this issue. U-NSGA-III is capable of adapting automatically to the dimensionality of the problem in hand through its niching based selection operator. However, the authors of U-NSGA-III abided by this single-fold restriction in all NSGA-III simulations of their study. In this paper we test the possibility of ignoring this restriction of NSGA-III and use multiple population folds to solve single, multi and many-objective problems. Simulations are performed on a variety of constrained and unconstrained single, multi and many-objective problems for this purpose. The strengths and weaknesses of multi-fold NSGA-III compared to those of U-NSGA-III are thoroughly investigated here. The robustness of NSGA-III in each type of problems is also discussed. This study provides a more comprehensive evaluation of the original NSGA-III procedure, which seems to have a wider scope than the original study had foreseen.

Key concepts: Sorting, Mathematical optimization, Selection (genetic algorithm), Population, Robustness (evolution), Computer science, Curse of dimensionality, Optimization problem

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of selection operator on NSGA-III in single, multi, and many-objective optimization — Research Paper | ScholarLens