Additional Light on the Origins of Federal Admiralty Jurisdiction
William R. Casto
Abstract
Open-access reader
William R. Casto
Abstract
Open-access reader
Professor Casto returns once again to the origins of federal admiralty jurisdiction. Using an essay by Peter Stephen Du Ponceau as support, Professor Casto forcefully argues that to understand the Founders’ attitudes towards admiralty litigation, one must approach the topic as a public-litigation paradigm as opposed to the modern private-litigation paradigm. He also responds to Professor Jonathan M. Gutoff’s of the public-litigation thesis.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Professor Casto returns once again to the origins of federal admiralty jurisdiction. Using an essay by Peter Stephen Du Ponceau as support, Professor Casto forcefully argues that to understand the Founders’ attitudes towards admiralty litigation, one must approach the topic as a public-litigation paradigm as opposed to the modern private-litigation paradigm. He also responds to Professor Jonathan M. Gutoff’s of the public-litigation thesis.
Key concepts: Federal jurisdiction, Jurisdiction, Political science, Law