2005ISBS - Conference Proceedings ArchiveRequires access

QUANTIFICATION OF DROP JUMPS FOR TRAINING IMPLICATION

Randall L. Jensen, Phillip B. Watts

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Peak vertical ground reaction force (F1peak), duration on force plate, flight time, and the eccentric loading rate (ELR) were examined during seven drop jumps (DJ) from 22.9 to 68.6 cm and a counter movement jump (CMJ). Thirty-four volunteers performed 16 jumps (14 DJs and 2 CMJs). Subjects were instructed to drop without changing the vertical component of the center of mass. They jumped maximally each jump using any technique and a rest period of 3+min between each jump was implemented. The data were gathered via force plate. Results indicated a significant F1peak difference between trials. There was a significant flight time difference between CMJ and DJs in a given trial, but no differences between DJs in a given trial. No significant differences were present for time spent on the plate between jumps, however; the ELR was different for DJs at the extremes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Peak vertical ground reaction force (F1peak), duration on force plate, flight time, and the eccentric loading rate (ELR) were examined during seven drop jumps (DJ) from 22.9 to 68.6 cm and a counter movement jump (CMJ). Thirty-four volunteers performed 16 jumps (14 DJs and 2 CMJs). Subjects were instructed to drop without changing the vertical component of the center of mass. They jumped maximally each jump using any technique and a rest period of 3+min between each jump was implemented. The data were gathered via force plate. Results indicated a significant F1peak difference between trials. There was a significant flight time difference between CMJ and DJs in a given trial, but no differences between DJs in a given trial. No significant differences were present for time spent on the plate between jumps, however; the ELR was different for DJs at the extremes.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Peak vertical ground reaction force (F1peak), duration on force plate, flight time, and the eccentric loading rate (ELR) were examined during seven drop jumps (DJ) from 22.9 to 68.6 cm and a counter movement jump (CMJ). Thirty-four volunteers performed 16 jumps (14 DJs and 2 CMJs). Subjects were instructed to drop without changing the vertical component of the center of mass. They jumped maximally each jump using any technique and a rest period of 3+min between each jump was implemented. The data were gathered via force plate. Results indicated a significant F1peak difference between trials. There was a significant flight time difference between CMJ and DJs in a given trial, but no differences between DJs in a given trial. No significant differences were present for time spent on the plate between jumps, however; the ELR was different for DJs at the extremes.

Key concepts: Jump, Ground reaction force, Jumping, Mathematics, Drop (telecommunication), Significant difference, Geodesy, Mechanics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
QUANTIFICATION OF DROP JUMPS FOR TRAINING IMPLICATION — Research Paper | ScholarLens