1999RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

PUBLIC TRANSPORT SUBSIDIES VERSUS ROAD PRICING: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS FOR INTERREGIONAL TRANSPORT IN BELGIUM

Bruno De Borger, Didier Swysen

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate when subsidies for public transport are justified. We first theoretically identify the key parameters in determining the desirability of public transport subsidies. We then use a detailed numerical optimisation model, calibrated with data on interregional transport in Belgium in 2005, to empirically determine second-best level and structure of public transport fares under a number of assumptions. We compare them to the reference situation, and to the first-best solution where each transport mode is priced at marginal social costs. The results show that subsidies for public transport turn out to be optimal in most second-best situations. Moreover, free bus service turned out to be optimal in the peak period if car prices for some reason cannot be manipulated, and if a fair amount of substitution between bus and car use exists.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this paper is to investigate when subsidies for public transport are justified. We first theoretically identify the key parameters in determining the desirability of public transport subsidies. We then use a detailed numerical optimisation model, calibrated with data on interregional transport in Belgium in 2005, to empirically determine second-best level and structure of public transport fares under a number of assumptions. We compare them to the reference situation, and to the first-best solution where each transport mode is priced at marginal social costs. The results show that subsidies for public transport turn out to be optimal in most second-best situations. Moreover, free bus service turned out to be optimal in the peak period if car prices for some reason cannot be manipulated, and if a fair amount of substitution between bus and car use exists.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate when subsidies for public transport are justified. We first theoretically identify the key parameters in determining the desirability of public transport subsidies. We then use a detailed numerical optimisation model, calibrated with data on interregional transport in Belgium in 2005, to empirically determine second-best level and structure of public transport fares under a number of assumptions. We compare them to the reference situation, and to the first-best solution where each transport mode is priced at marginal social costs. The results show that subsidies for public transport turn out to be optimal in most second-best situations. Moreover, free bus service turned out to be optimal in the peak period if car prices for some reason cannot be manipulated, and if a fair amount of substitution between bus and car use exists.

Key concepts: Subsidy, Public transport, Passenger transport, Economics, Service (business), Mode (computer interface), Public economics, Private transport

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
PUBLIC TRANSPORT SUBSIDIES VERSUS ROAD PRICING: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS FOR INTERREGIONAL TRANSPORT IN BELGIUM — Research Paper | ScholarLens