1999PubMedRequires access

Retreatment of non-responder or relapser chronic hepatitis C patients with interferon plus ribavirin vs interferon alone.

Michele Stanislaw Milella, Teresa Santantonio, G Pietromatera, Rosario Maselli, C Casalino, Nicola Mariano, Claudia Genchi, Gianni Pastore

Open publisher page 36 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Interferon-alpha treatment of chronic hepatitis C is beneficial in only 20-30% of patients. This study evaluates if combination therapy with Interferon-alfa plus ribavirin is effective in inducing a response in patients who did not respond to, or relapsed after, a standard Interferon-alfa treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 88 patients, 49 non-responders and 39 relapsers to previous Interferon-alfa therapy, were randomized to receive either natural Interferon-alfa (6 MU t.i.w.) plus ribavirin (1000 mg/daily) or natural Interferon-alfa alone (6 MU t.i.w.) for 6 months. All were followed for 12 months after stopping therapy. Serum aminotransferase levels were assessed monthly and HCV RNA was evaluated by RT-PCR (Amplicor, Roche) at end of therapy and the end of follow-up. RESULTS: After treatment, a higher response rate defined as return to normal of aminotransferases and absence of serum HCV RNA was observed among patients treated with Interferon-alfa-ribavirin: 4/28 (14%) vs 1/21 (5%) non-responder patients and 9/19 (47%) vs 5/20 (25%) in the relapsers group. At the end of follow-up, a sustained response was found only in the combination treatment group: 4% and 32% in non-responder and relapser patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that retreatment with natural Interferon-alfa plus ribavirin is more effective than Interferon-alfa alone in increasing the response rate in patients with chronic hepatitis C who relapse after a previous standard IFN treatment whereas it is less effective in non-responder patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Interferon-alpha treatment of chronic hepatitis C is beneficial in only 20-30% of patients. This study evaluates if combination therapy with Interferon-alfa plus ribavirin is effective in inducing a response in patients who did not respond to, or relapsed after, a standard Interferon-alfa treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 88 patients, 49 non-responders and 39 relapsers to previous Interferon-alfa therapy, were randomized to receive either natural Interferon-alfa (6 MU t.i.w.) plus ribavirin (1000 mg/daily) or natural Interferon-alfa alone (6 MU t.i.w.) for 6 months. All were followed for 12 months after stopping therapy. Serum aminotransferase levels were assessed monthly and HCV RNA was evaluated by RT-PCR (Amplicor, Roche) at end of therapy and the end of follow-up. RESULTS: After treatment, a higher response rate defined as return to normal of aminotransferases and absence of serum HCV RNA was observed among patients treated with Interferon-alfa-ribavirin: 4/28 (14%) vs 1/21 (5%) non-responder patients and 9/19 (47%) vs 5/20 (25%) in the relapsers group. At the end of follow-up, a sustained response was found only in the combination treatment group: 4% and 32% in non-responder and relapser patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that retreatment with natural Interferon-alfa plus ribavirin is more effective than Interferon-alfa alone in increasing the response rate in patients with chronic hepatitis C who relapse after a previous standard IFN treatment whereas it is less effective in non-responder patients.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 36 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Interferon-alpha treatment of chronic hepatitis C is beneficial in only 20-30% of patients. This study evaluates if combination therapy with Interferon-alfa plus ribavirin is effective in inducing a response in patients who did not respond to, or relapsed after, a standard Interferon-alfa treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 88 patients, 49 non-responders and 39 relapsers to previous Interferon-alfa therapy, were randomized to receive either natural Interferon-alfa (6 MU t.i.w.) plus ribavirin (1000 mg/daily) or natural Interferon-alfa alone (6 MU t.i.w.) for 6 months. All were followed for 12 months after stopping therapy. Serum aminotransferase levels were assessed monthly and HCV RNA was evaluated by RT-PCR (Amplicor, Roche) at end of therapy and the end of follow-up. RESULTS: After treatment, a higher response rate defined as return to normal of aminotransferases and absence of serum HCV RNA was observed among patients treated with Interferon-alfa-ribavirin: 4/28 (14%) vs 1/21 (5%) non-responder patients and 9/19 (47%) vs 5/20 (25%) in the relapsers group. At the end of follow-up, a sustained response was found only in the combination treatment group: 4% and 32% in non-responder and relapser patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that retreatment with natural Interferon-alfa plus ribavirin is more effective than Interferon-alfa alone in increasing the response rate in patients with chronic hepatitis C who relapse after a previous standard IFN treatment whereas it is less effective in non-responder patients.

Key concepts: Medicine, Ribavirin, Interferon, Interferon alfa, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Alpha interferon, Chronic hepatitis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Retreatment of non-responder or relapser chronic hepatitis C patients with interferon plus ribavirin vs interferon alone. — Research Paper | ScholarLens