2008•Annals of Plant Protection SciencesRequires access

Redescription of Ditylenchus angustus (Butler, 1913) Filipjev, 1936

Debanand Das, Harish K. Bajaj

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Ditylenchus angustus was redescribed from the materials collected from deep water rice from Assam. D. angustus was morphologically distinct from previously described specimens having different head shape, narrow and slender isthmus, crustaformeria with 4–5 cells in each row, longer post vulval uterine sac and short conoid tail with a mucro.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Ditylenchus angustus was redescribed from the materials collected from deep water rice from Assam. D. angustus was morphologically distinct from previously described specimens having different head shape, narrow and slender isthmus, crustaformeria with 4–5 cells in each row, longer post vulval uterine sac and short conoid tail with a mucro.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Ditylenchus angustus was redescribed from the materials collected from deep water rice from Assam. D. angustus was morphologically distinct from previously described specimens having different head shape, narrow and slender isthmus, crustaformeria with 4–5 cells in each row, longer post vulval uterine sac and short conoid tail with a mucro.

Key concepts: Conoid, Anatomy, Biology, Veterinary medicine, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Redescription of Ditylenchus angustus (Butler, 1913) Filipjev, 1936 — Research Paper | ScholarLens