1993•Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Requires access

Meeting the Enduring Challenge, United Stated Air Force Basic Doctrine Through 1992

Andrew D. Dembosky

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Since the 1920s, the United States Air Force has based much of its doctrine on beliefs in the capabilities of strategic bombing that history has not fully borne out. These beliefs, and a lack of critical, objective analysis of experience, are evident in successive versions of the Air Force manual for basic doctrine. The first part of this thesis reviews these doctrine manuals and Air Force thinking through the 1970s. During the 1970s and 1980s, an increasing number of Air Force officers began to realize these, and other, deficiencies in the service's doctrine. The publication of their criticisms and suggestions in various books, articles, and research studies coincided with the establishment of two Air Force organizations specifically devoted to the study of air power history and doctrine. The combination during the late 1980s of these organizations and the officers who worked in them led to the development of a completely new doctrine manual.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since the 1920s, the United States Air Force has based much of its doctrine on beliefs in the capabilities of strategic bombing that history has not fully borne out. These beliefs, and a lack of critical, objective analysis of experience, are evident in successive versions of the Air Force manual for basic doctrine. The first part of this thesis reviews these doctrine manuals and Air Force thinking through the 1970s. During the 1970s and 1980s, an increasing number of Air Force officers began to realize these, and other, deficiencies in the service's doctrine. The publication of their criticisms and suggestions in various books, articles, and research studies coincided with the establishment of two Air Force organizations specifically devoted to the study of air power history and doctrine. The combination during the late 1980s of these organizations and the officers who worked in them led to the development of a completely new doctrine manual.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since the 1920s, the United States Air Force has based much of its doctrine on beliefs in the capabilities of strategic bombing that history has not fully borne out. These beliefs, and a lack of critical, objective analysis of experience, are evident in successive versions of the Air Force manual for basic doctrine. The first part of this thesis reviews these doctrine manuals and Air Force thinking through the 1970s. During the 1970s and 1980s, an increasing number of Air Force officers began to realize these, and other, deficiencies in the service's doctrine. The publication of their criticisms and suggestions in various books, articles, and research studies coincided with the establishment of two Air Force organizations specifically devoted to the study of air power history and doctrine. The combination during the late 1980s of these organizations and the officers who worked in them led to the development of a completely new doctrine manual.

Key concepts: Doctrine, Military doctrine, Political science, Law, Engineering, Management, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Meeting the Enduring Challenge, United Stated Air Force Basic Doctrine Through 1992 — Research Paper | ScholarLens