2008•RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

Non-Exponential Discounting: A Direct Test

Richard Startz, Kwok Ping Tsang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Standard models of intertemporal utility maximization under uncertainty assume that agents discount future utility flows at a constant compounded rate—exponential discounting. Euler equations estimated over different time horizons should have equal discount rates. They do not. Rising term yield premia on safe nominal bonds imply discount rates that rise with longer horizons, as uncertainty is much too small to account for the difference in interest rates. Five-year discount rates are roughly triple one-quarter discount rates. Such deviations from exponential discounting are large enough to make a large difference in consumption choices over long horizons. Our rejection of exponential discounting raises doubts about dynamic consistency in consumer choice, and therefore calls into question an underpinning of many intertemporal models.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Standard models of intertemporal utility maximization under uncertainty assume that agents discount future utility flows at a constant compounded rate—exponential discounting. Euler equations estimated over different time horizons should have equal discount rates. They do not. Rising term yield premia on safe nominal bonds imply discount rates that rise with longer horizons, as uncertainty is much too small to account for the difference in interest rates. Five-year discount rates are roughly triple one-quarter discount rates. Such deviations from exponential discounting are large enough to make a large difference in consumption choices over long horizons. Our rejection of exponential discounting raises doubts about dynamic consistency in consumer choice, and therefore calls into question an underpinning of many intertemporal models.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Standard models of intertemporal utility maximization under uncertainty assume that agents discount future utility flows at a constant compounded rate—exponential discounting. Euler equations estimated over different time horizons should have equal discount rates. They do not. Rising term yield premia on safe nominal bonds imply discount rates that rise with longer horizons, as uncertainty is much too small to account for the difference in interest rates. Five-year discount rates are roughly triple one-quarter discount rates. Such deviations from exponential discounting are large enough to make a large difference in consumption choices over long horizons. Our rejection of exponential discounting raises doubts about dynamic consistency in consumer choice, and therefore calls into question an underpinning of many intertemporal models.

Key concepts: Discounting, Economics, Econometrics, Exponential function, Intertemporal choice, Consumption (sociology), Mathematical economics, Consistency (knowledge bases)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Non-Exponential Discounting: A Direct Test — Research Paper | ScholarLens