1972Clinical ChemistryRequires access

Comparison of Results from the Du Pont "ACA" and Technicon "SMA 12/ 60"

James O. Westgard, Brenda L Lahmeyer

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

Abstract The Du Pont "Automatic Clinical Analyzer" (ACA) and the Technicon "SMA 12/60" were compared as to precision, range of linearity, and results for sera from patients. Precision of the ACA was equal to or better than that of the SMA 12/60 for all determinations except SGOT in the normal range. The ACA showed a wider range of linearity for BUN, total protein, LDH, alkaline phosphatase, SGOT, and bilirubin, and equal linear ranges for glucose and albumin. Patient’s sera comparisons showed differences for glucose in uremic sera. Albumin values from the ACA did not compare well with those by HABA dye method from the SMA 12/60, but did compare well with values obtained by electrophoresis and by a bromcresol green method adapted to the SMA 12/60. Bilirubin values from the ACA were higher than those from the SMA 12/60. Comparable results were obtained for the enzyme determinations when the SMA 12/60 was calibrated in the same units as the ACA.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The Du Pont "Automatic Clinical Analyzer" (ACA) and the Technicon "SMA 12/60" were compared as to precision, range of linearity, and results for sera from patients. Precision of the ACA was equal to or better than that of the SMA 12/60 for all determinations except SGOT in the normal range. The ACA showed a wider range of linearity for BUN, total protein, LDH, alkaline phosphatase, SGOT, and bilirubin, and equal linear ranges for glucose and albumin. Patient’s sera comparisons showed differences for glucose in uremic sera. Albumin values from the ACA did not compare well with those by HABA dye method from the SMA 12/60, but did compare well with values obtained by electrophoresis and by a bromcresol green method adapted to the SMA 12/60. Bilirubin values from the ACA were higher than those from the SMA 12/60. Comparable results were obtained for the enzyme determinations when the SMA 12/60 was calibrated in the same units as the ACA.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The Du Pont "Automatic Clinical Analyzer" (ACA) and the Technicon "SMA 12/60" were compared as to precision, range of linearity, and results for sera from patients. Precision of the ACA was equal to or better than that of the SMA 12/60 for all determinations except SGOT in the normal range. The ACA showed a wider range of linearity for BUN, total protein, LDH, alkaline phosphatase, SGOT, and bilirubin, and equal linear ranges for glucose and albumin. Patient’s sera comparisons showed differences for glucose in uremic sera. Albumin values from the ACA did not compare well with those by HABA dye method from the SMA 12/60, but did compare well with values obtained by electrophoresis and by a bromcresol green method adapted to the SMA 12/60. Bilirubin values from the ACA were higher than those from the SMA 12/60. Comparable results were obtained for the enzyme determinations when the SMA 12/60 was calibrated in the same units as the ACA.

Key concepts: AutoAnalyzer, SMA*, Albumin, Bilirubin, Chromatography, Chemistry, Alkaline phosphatase, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Results from the Du Pont "ACA" and Technicon "SMA 12/ 60" — Research Paper | ScholarLens