2010Plant Disease ResearchRequires access

Development of benzimidazole and DMI resistance in Gloeosporium ampelophagum from Maharashtra state

V. C. Khilare, Sreedevi S Chavan, L. V. Gangawane

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Continuous use of carbendazim, difenoconazole and propiconazole has led to development of resistance in Gloeosporium ampelophagum. Among 37 isolates of pathogen, 97.30% population was highly resistant to carbendazim (MIC 1.01 to 28549.43 µg/ml), 5.41% to difenoconazole (MIC 25.63 µg/ml) and 10.81% to propiconazole (MIC 6.26 µg/ml). It was observed that the development of resistance against difenoconazole and propiconazole was increased when compared with carbendazim. Highly resistant population is less in both difenoconazole and propiconazole fungicides. It was noted that difenoconazole and propiconazole are yet suitable for the management of G. ampelophagum where selection pressure is less when compared with carbendazim. Carbendazim became unsuitable due to development of high resistance in G. ampelophagum. However, there will be future need to develop eresistance management strategyi against difenoconazole and propiconazole.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Continuous use of carbendazim, difenoconazole and propiconazole has led to development of resistance in Gloeosporium ampelophagum. Among 37 isolates of pathogen, 97.30% population was highly resistant to carbendazim (MIC 1.01 to 28549.43 µg/ml), 5.41% to difenoconazole (MIC 25.63 µg/ml) and 10.81% to propiconazole (MIC 6.26 µg/ml). It was observed that the development of resistance against difenoconazole and propiconazole was increased when compared with carbendazim. Highly resistant population is less in both difenoconazole and propiconazole fungicides. It was noted that difenoconazole and propiconazole are yet suitable for the management of G. ampelophagum where selection pressure is less when compared with carbendazim. Carbendazim became unsuitable due to development of high resistance in G. ampelophagum. However, there will be future need to develop eresistance management strategyi against difenoconazole and propiconazole.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Continuous use of carbendazim, difenoconazole and propiconazole has led to development of resistance in Gloeosporium ampelophagum. Among 37 isolates of pathogen, 97.30% population was highly resistant to carbendazim (MIC 1.01 to 28549.43 µg/ml), 5.41% to difenoconazole (MIC 25.63 µg/ml) and 10.81% to propiconazole (MIC 6.26 µg/ml). It was observed that the development of resistance against difenoconazole and propiconazole was increased when compared with carbendazim. Highly resistant population is less in both difenoconazole and propiconazole fungicides. It was noted that difenoconazole and propiconazole are yet suitable for the management of G. ampelophagum where selection pressure is less when compared with carbendazim. Carbendazim became unsuitable due to development of high resistance in G. ampelophagum. However, there will be future need to develop eresistance management strategyi against difenoconazole and propiconazole.

Key concepts: Propiconazole, Carbendazim, Fungicide, Benzimidazole, Population, Biology, Veterinary medicine, Horticulture

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Development of benzimidazole and DMI resistance in Gloeosporium ampelophagum from Maharashtra state — Research Paper | ScholarLens