1984•Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Requires access

Archaeological Investigations at Nonhabitation and Burial Sites, Chief Joseph Dam Project, Washington.

Sarah K. Campbell, James Alexander, Marilyn G Hawkes, Daniel Leen, Deborah E. Newman

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Of the 98 nonhabitation sites recorded for the reservoir, 13 which were in danger of inundation by the planned pool raise were recommended for Phase I mitigation and 45 which were not directly threatened, for Phase II mitigation. All rock art sites recommended for recording in Phase I or Phase II and all other accessible rock art sites in the reservoir were recorded. Recommended actions were taken at all Phase I rock feature sites. None of the features were found to mark burials; instead they either had no associated cultural materials or were of historic origin. Phase II sites were examined more selectively to insure that cairns from different contexts were examined. The only conclusively demonstrated prehistoric function for cairns is burial markers, and the best demonstrated historic feature types are fence supports and traps. The identification of some rock piles as homestead boundary markers, rock piles created by clearing rocks from fields, or placer mine deposits, is dependent on context, as artifacts were not found in association. Likewise, some rock features are interpreted as hunting blinds or trap anchors on the basis of location and lack of other demonstrated function. They cannot be certainly assigned to either the historic or prehistoric period. Burials were located during investigation of two rock feature sites and one prehistoric habitation site, and another was exposed by erosion at a prehistoric habitation site after the 1981 pool raise. All were relocated under a separate contract modification.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Of the 98 nonhabitation sites recorded for the reservoir, 13 which were in danger of inundation by the planned pool raise were recommended for Phase I mitigation and 45 which were not directly threatened, for Phase II mitigation. All rock art sites recommended for recording in Phase I or Phase II and all other accessible rock art sites in the reservoir were recorded. Recommended actions were taken at all Phase I rock feature sites. None of the features were found to mark burials; instead they either had no associated cultural materials or were of historic origin. Phase II sites were examined more selectively to insure that cairns from different contexts were examined. The only conclusively demonstrated prehistoric function for cairns is burial markers, and the best demonstrated historic feature types are fence supports and traps. The identification of some rock piles as homestead boundary markers, rock piles created by clearing rocks from fields, or placer mine deposits, is dependent on context, as artifacts were not found in association. Likewise, some rock features are interpreted as hunting blinds or trap anchors on the basis of location and lack of other demonstrated function. They cannot be certainly assigned to either the historic or prehistoric period. Burials were located during investigation of two rock feature sites and one prehistoric habitation site, and another was exposed by erosion at a prehistoric habitation site after the 1981 pool raise. All were relocated under a separate contract modification.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Of the 98 nonhabitation sites recorded for the reservoir, 13 which were in danger of inundation by the planned pool raise were recommended for Phase I mitigation and 45 which were not directly threatened, for Phase II mitigation. All rock art sites recommended for recording in Phase I or Phase II and all other accessible rock art sites in the reservoir were recorded. Recommended actions were taken at all Phase I rock feature sites. None of the features were found to mark burials; instead they either had no associated cultural materials or were of historic origin. Phase II sites were examined more selectively to insure that cairns from different contexts were examined. The only conclusively demonstrated prehistoric function for cairns is burial markers, and the best demonstrated historic feature types are fence supports and traps. The identification of some rock piles as homestead boundary markers, rock piles created by clearing rocks from fields, or placer mine deposits, is dependent on context, as artifacts were not found in association. Likewise, some rock features are interpreted as hunting blinds or trap anchors on the basis of location and lack of other demonstrated function. They cannot be certainly assigned to either the historic or prehistoric period. Burials were located during investigation of two rock feature sites and one prehistoric habitation site, and another was exposed by erosion at a prehistoric habitation site after the 1981 pool raise. All were relocated under a separate contract modification.

Key concepts: Prehistory, Archaeology, Context (archaeology), Geology, Rock art, Feature (linguistics), Excavation, Rock shelter

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Archaeological Investigations at Nonhabitation and Burial Sites, Chief Joseph Dam Project, Washington. — Research Paper | ScholarLens