1983Unpublished venueRequires access

COMMENTS ON THE PAPER ROLLOVERS AND SERIOUS DRIVER INJURY DIFFERENCES AMONG VARIOUS UTILITY VEHICLES, PICKUP TRUCKS, AND PASSENGER CAR GROUPS

H C Joksch

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A critique of the epidemiological study entitled, Rollover and Serious Driver Injury Differences Among Various Utility Vehicle, Pickup Truck and Passenger Car Groups, by Reinfurt, O'Neill et al. is presented and supported by data. The Reinfurt-O'Neill study used an admittedly inadequate exposure measure (registered vehicle years) and did not adequately control for non-vehicle factors influencing accidents and injuries. Using published information and accident data from the Fatal Accident Reporting System, the critique shows that there are important differences between passenger cars and utility vehicles, and among utility vehicles in terms of drivers and driving conditions. Because Reinfurt and O'Neill do not control for such factors, their study does not permit comparisons among vehicle groups that would show vehicle specific differences influencing accident, rollover, or injury risk.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A critique of the epidemiological study entitled, Rollover and Serious Driver Injury Differences Among Various Utility Vehicle, Pickup Truck and Passenger Car Groups, by Reinfurt, O'Neill et al. is presented and supported by data. The Reinfurt-O'Neill study used an admittedly inadequate exposure measure (registered vehicle years) and did not adequately control for non-vehicle factors influencing accidents and injuries. Using published information and accident data from the Fatal Accident Reporting System, the critique shows that there are important differences between passenger cars and utility vehicles, and among utility vehicles in terms of drivers and driving conditions. Because Reinfurt and O'Neill do not control for such factors, their study does not permit comparisons among vehicle groups that would show vehicle specific differences influencing accident, rollover, or injury risk.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A critique of the epidemiological study entitled, Rollover and Serious Driver Injury Differences Among Various Utility Vehicle, Pickup Truck and Passenger Car Groups, by Reinfurt, O'Neill et al. is presented and supported by data. The Reinfurt-O'Neill study used an admittedly inadequate exposure measure (registered vehicle years) and did not adequately control for non-vehicle factors influencing accidents and injuries. Using published information and accident data from the Fatal Accident Reporting System, the critique shows that there are important differences between passenger cars and utility vehicles, and among utility vehicles in terms of drivers and driving conditions. Because Reinfurt and O'Neill do not control for such factors, their study does not permit comparisons among vehicle groups that would show vehicle specific differences influencing accident, rollover, or injury risk.

Key concepts: Rollover (web design), Truck, Control (management), Poison control, Vehicle safety, Injury prevention, Engineering, Transport engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
COMMENTS ON THE PAPER ROLLOVERS AND SERIOUS DRIVER INJURY DIFFERENCES AMONG VARIOUS UTILITY VEHICLES, PICKUP TRUCKS, AND PASSENGER CAR GROUPS — Research Paper | ScholarLens