2009•Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding (The)Requires access

Interpreting the effects of genotype x environment interaction on cane and sugar yields in sugarcane based on the AMMI model

Sanjeev Kumar, Syed Sarfaraz Hasan, P. K. Singh, Dinesh Kumar Pandey, Johar Singh

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in six environments (2 water regimes x 3 crops) during 2005–07 to study the effect of genotype x environment interaction (GEI) on cane and sugar yields in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). Analysis of variance of 11 genotypes revealed that genotype, environment, and GEI were highly significant. Highly significant GEI effects indicated the necessity for testing newly developed genotypes under different environments. The additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model was used to interpret the GEI. The first two IPCAs of the AMMI analysis of GEI accounted for 90.39% of this variation for cane yield and 92.54% for sugar yield. AMMI-1 biplot showed that genotype LG 03001 had very good cane yield with specific adaptation to the 1st year and 2nd year plant crop under optimum condition. For sugar yield, LG 03001 and LG 03002 were better adapted to the 2nd year plant crop under normal and moisture-deficit conditions, respectively, Considering only the IPCA-1 scores, BO 91 (average yielder) and LG 03007 (poor yielder) were the most stable for cane yield, whereas BO 91 was more stable in terms of sugar yield. AMMI-2 biplot indicated that LG 03003 for cane yield and LG 03007 and BO 91 for sugar yield had small interaction with environments, reflecting their stability in yield performance across environments.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Field experiments were conducted in six environments (2 water regimes x 3 crops) during 2005–07 to study the effect of genotype x environment interaction (GEI) on cane and sugar yields in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). Analysis of variance of 11 genotypes revealed that genotype, environment, and GEI were highly significant. Highly significant GEI effects indicated the necessity for testing newly developed genotypes under different environments. The additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model was used to interpret the GEI. The first two IPCAs of the AMMI analysis of GEI accounted for 90.39% of this variation for cane yield and 92.54% for sugar yield. AMMI-1 biplot showed that genotype LG 03001 had very good cane yield with specific adaptation to the 1st year and 2nd year plant crop under optimum condition. For sugar yield, LG 03001 and LG 03002 were better adapted to the 2nd year plant crop under normal and moisture-deficit conditions, respectively, Considering only the IPCA-1 scores, BO 91 (average yielder) and LG 03007 (poor yielder) were the most stable for cane yield, whereas BO 91 was more stable in terms of sugar yield. AMMI-2 biplot indicated that LG 03003 for cane yield and LG 03007 and BO 91 for sugar yield had small interaction with environments, reflecting their stability in yield performance across environments.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Field experiments were conducted in six environments (2 water regimes x 3 crops) during 2005–07 to study the effect of genotype x environment interaction (GEI) on cane and sugar yields in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). Analysis of variance of 11 genotypes revealed that genotype, environment, and GEI were highly significant. Highly significant GEI effects indicated the necessity for testing newly developed genotypes under different environments. The additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model was used to interpret the GEI. The first two IPCAs of the AMMI analysis of GEI accounted for 90.39% of this variation for cane yield and 92.54% for sugar yield. AMMI-1 biplot showed that genotype LG 03001 had very good cane yield with specific adaptation to the 1st year and 2nd year plant crop under optimum condition. For sugar yield, LG 03001 and LG 03002 were better adapted to the 2nd year plant crop under normal and moisture-deficit conditions, respectively, Considering only the IPCA-1 scores, BO 91 (average yielder) and LG 03007 (poor yielder) were the most stable for cane yield, whereas BO 91 was more stable in terms of sugar yield. AMMI-2 biplot indicated that LG 03003 for cane yield and LG 03007 and BO 91 for sugar yield had small interaction with environments, reflecting their stability in yield performance across environments.

Key concepts: Ammi, Biplot, Cane, Saccharum, Sugar, Yield (engineering), Crop, Interaction

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Interpreting the effects of genotype x environment interaction on cane and sugar yields in sugarcane based on the AMMI model — Research Paper | ScholarLens