ScholarLens Back to search
2013•SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Personal Reflections on Connick v. Thompson

Michael V. Vitiello

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This essay describes a minor role that I took in Connick v. Thompson. After offering that background, I use the case to discuss why I oppose the death penalty.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This essay describes a minor role that I took in Connick v. Thompson. After offering that background, I use the case to discuss why I oppose the death penalty.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This essay describes a minor role that I took in Connick v. Thompson. After offering that background, I use the case to discuss why I oppose the death penalty.

Key concepts: Psychology, Economics, Political science, Sociology

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Personal Reflections on Connick v. Thompson — Research Paper | ScholarLens