2005Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Freedom of religious choice

Paul M. Taylor

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Introduction The focus of this chapter is principally that part of the forum internum concerned with the freedom of each individual to choose a particular religion, to maintain adherence to a religion or to change religion altogether at any time, and the right to be free from restrictions or coercive forces that impair that choice. Personal choice in such matters is unrestricted for reasons of principle and because of the impossibility of providing otherwise. Pfeffer had this in mind when commenting, ‘as the common-law adage has it, the devil himself knows not the thoughts of man’. Similarly, as Krishnaswami noted, ‘[f]reedom to maintain or to change religion or belief falls primarily within the domain of the inner faith and conscience of an individual. Viewed from this angle, one would assume that any intervention from outside is not only illegitimate but impossible.’ Nevertheless, the right to freedom of choice of religion or belief has been one of the most controversial and contested aspects of the right to freedom of thought, conscience or religion. The different formulations of the freedom found in United Nations texts reflect differences in emphasis and intention between those States, on the one hand, which sought unrestricted freedom for the individual to change religion (without considering it necessary to contemplate a right to ‘maintain’ a religion) and, on the other hand, those for whom a right to maintain religion was paramount.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction The focus of this chapter is principally that part of the forum internum concerned with the freedom of each individual to choose a particular religion, to maintain adherence to a religion or to change religion altogether at any time, and the right to be free from restrictions or coercive forces that impair that choice. Personal choice in such matters is unrestricted for reasons of principle and because of the impossibility of providing otherwise. Pfeffer had this in mind when commenting, ‘as the common-law adage has it, the devil himself knows not the thoughts of man’. Similarly, as Krishnaswami noted, ‘[f]reedom to maintain or to change religion or belief falls primarily within the domain of the inner faith and conscience of an individual. Viewed from this angle, one would assume that any intervention from outside is not only illegitimate but impossible.’ Nevertheless, the right to freedom of choice of religion or belief has been one of the most controversial and contested aspects of the right to freedom of thought, conscience or religion. The different formulations of the freedom found in United Nations texts reflect differences in emphasis and intention between those States, on the one hand, which sought unrestricted freedom for the individual to change religion (without considering it necessary to contemplate a right to ‘maintain’ a religion) and, on the other hand, those for whom a right to maintain religion was paramount.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction The focus of this chapter is principally that part of the forum internum concerned with the freedom of each individual to choose a particular religion, to maintain adherence to a religion or to change religion altogether at any time, and the right to be free from restrictions or coercive forces that impair that choice. Personal choice in such matters is unrestricted for reasons of principle and because of the impossibility of providing otherwise. Pfeffer had this in mind when commenting, ‘as the common-law adage has it, the devil himself knows not the thoughts of man’. Similarly, as Krishnaswami noted, ‘[f]reedom to maintain or to change religion or belief falls primarily within the domain of the inner faith and conscience of an individual. Viewed from this angle, one would assume that any intervention from outside is not only illegitimate but impossible.’ Nevertheless, the right to freedom of choice of religion or belief has been one of the most controversial and contested aspects of the right to freedom of thought, conscience or religion. The different formulations of the freedom found in United Nations texts reflect differences in emphasis and intention between those States, on the one hand, which sought unrestricted freedom for the individual to change religion (without considering it necessary to contemplate a right to ‘maintain’ a religion) and, on the other hand, those for whom a right to maintain religion was paramount.

Key concepts: Religious freedom, Sociology, Political science, Law, Economic freedom

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Freedom of religious choice — Research Paper | ScholarLens