2014Language & HistoryRequires access

How and Why Saussure is Misread in China: A Historical Study

Y Zhang, Shaojie Zhang

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

As father of modern linguistics, Ferdinand de Saussure has been known in China for more than eighty years. A historical review of Saussurean studies in China indicates that some misunderstandings on Saussure need to be cleared up. This paper mainly focuses on how Chinese scholars misread Saussure from the perspective of the arbitrary nature of language and points out that motivation or iconicity is not contradictory to arbitrariness in Saussurean linguistics. It also shows that Chinese historical developments have had profound effects on the reception of Saussure. To some extent, politics, culture, and education in China are responsible for the misinterpretations of Saussure. Misreading Saussure just reflects that there is still a long way to go for the study of Saussure in the Chinese linguistics world.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As father of modern linguistics, Ferdinand de Saussure has been known in China for more than eighty years. A historical review of Saussurean studies in China indicates that some misunderstandings on Saussure need to be cleared up. This paper mainly focuses on how Chinese scholars misread Saussure from the perspective of the arbitrary nature of language and points out that motivation or iconicity is not contradictory to arbitrariness in Saussurean linguistics. It also shows that Chinese historical developments have had profound effects on the reception of Saussure. To some extent, politics, culture, and education in China are responsible for the misinterpretations of Saussure. Misreading Saussure just reflects that there is still a long way to go for the study of Saussure in the Chinese linguistics world.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As father of modern linguistics, Ferdinand de Saussure has been known in China for more than eighty years. A historical review of Saussurean studies in China indicates that some misunderstandings on Saussure need to be cleared up. This paper mainly focuses on how Chinese scholars misread Saussure from the perspective of the arbitrary nature of language and points out that motivation or iconicity is not contradictory to arbitrariness in Saussurean linguistics. It also shows that Chinese historical developments have had profound effects on the reception of Saussure. To some extent, politics, culture, and education in China are responsible for the misinterpretations of Saussure. Misreading Saussure just reflects that there is still a long way to go for the study of Saussure in the Chinese linguistics world.

Key concepts: Arbitrariness, China, Iconicity, Linguistics, Perspective (graphical), Historical linguistics, Sociology, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
How and Why Saussure is Misread in China: A Historical Study — Research Paper | ScholarLens