2005RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsOpen access

Competition Policy for Intellectual Property: Balancing Competition and Reward

Richard J. Gilbert, Alan J Weinschel

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

1 "The tensions between the doctrines tend to obscure the fact that, properly understood, IP law and antitrust law both seek to promote innovation and enhance consumer welfare."Timothy Muris

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

1 "The tensions between the doctrines tend to obscure the fact that, properly understood, IP law and antitrust law both seek to promote innovation and enhance consumer welfare."Timothy Muris

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

1 "The tensions between the doctrines tend to obscure the fact that, properly understood, IP law and antitrust law both seek to promote innovation and enhance consumer welfare."Timothy Muris

Key concepts: Enforcement, Intellectual property, Competitor analysis, Competition (biology), Incentive, Business, Scope (computer science), Industrial organization

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Competition Policy for Intellectual Property: Balancing Competition and Reward — Research Paper | ScholarLens