1988Journal of Clinical MicrobiologyOpen access

Multicenter comparative evaluation of two rapid microscopic methods and culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in patient specimens

Richard C. Tilton, Franklyn N. Judson, Robert C. Barnes, R P Gruninger, Raymond Ryan, Ólafur Steingrı́msson

Open full text 26 citations

Abstract

Four hundred and seventy-three men and women at high risk for sexually transmitted disease were tested for the presence of Chlamydia trachomatis in the urethra or the endocervix. Four groups were involved in this multicenter study of two direct fluorescent-antibody microscopy tests, Kallestad Pathfinder and Syva Microtrak, compared with culture techniques. Results from the test sites indicated that there was no significant difference overall in the sensitivity and specificity of the two test kits. However, there was some interlaboratory variation seen in the sensitivity of the microscopy, but little difference in the specificity. Either kit could be an effective screening method for C. trachomatis in high-risk populations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Four hundred and seventy-three men and women at high risk for sexually transmitted disease were tested for the presence of Chlamydia trachomatis in the urethra or the endocervix. Four groups were involved in this multicenter study of two direct fluorescent-antibody microscopy tests, Kallestad Pathfinder and Syva Microtrak, compared with culture techniques. Results from the test sites indicated that there was no significant difference overall in the sensitivity and specificity of the two test kits. However, there was some interlaboratory variation seen in the sensitivity of the microscopy, but little difference in the specificity. Either kit could be an effective screening method for C. trachomatis in high-risk populations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Four hundred and seventy-three men and women at high risk for sexually transmitted disease were tested for the presence of Chlamydia trachomatis in the urethra or the endocervix. Four groups were involved in this multicenter study of two direct fluorescent-antibody microscopy tests, Kallestad Pathfinder and Syva Microtrak, compared with culture techniques. Results from the test sites indicated that there was no significant difference overall in the sensitivity and specificity of the two test kits. However, there was some interlaboratory variation seen in the sensitivity of the microscopy, but little difference in the specificity. Either kit could be an effective screening method for C. trachomatis in high-risk populations.

Key concepts: Chlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydiales, Chlamydiaceae, Sexually transmitted disease, Multicenter study, Endocervix, Chlamydia, Urethra

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Multicenter comparative evaluation of two rapid microscopic methods and culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in patient specimens — Research Paper | ScholarLens