1975•QIR (Kyushu University Institutional Repository) (Kyushu University)Open access

The Active Role of the Judge in Japanese Civil Litigation

Tokushige Yoshimura, 徳重 吉村

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

I.General observations, 1.The active functions of judges in several kinds of proceedings, 2.The historic change of the judge's functions in civil procedure, (a).Prewar civil procedure and its practice, (b).The postwar civil procedure reform and its practice, II.The active functions of judges in the process of litigation, 1.The court's power to check the complaint filed and to control commencement of action, 2.The court's power to control the claim, 3.The court's power to control the pleadings, 4.The court's power to control proof-taking, 5.The court's functions in developing the process, 6.The court's power to encourage to a "compromise", III.Some problems surrounding the active role of judges, 1.The active exercise of the judge's function in the social and economic climate of postwar Japan. 2.The judge's active function in small-claim cases and in suits without counsel, 3.The judge's function in the litigation with counsele, IV.The trend toward an increase in the number and power of special tribunals and the future of civil procedure

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

I.General observations, 1.The active functions of judges in several kinds of proceedings, 2.The historic change of the judge's functions in civil procedure, (a).Prewar civil procedure and its practice, (b).The postwar civil procedure reform and its practice, II.The active functions of judges in the process of litigation, 1.The court's power to check the complaint filed and to control commencement of action, 2.The court's power to control the claim, 3.The court's power to control the pleadings, 4.The court's power to control proof-taking, 5.The court's functions in developing the process, 6.The court's power to encourage to a "compromise", III.Some problems surrounding the active role of judges, 1.The active exercise of the judge's function in the social and economic climate of postwar Japan. 2.The judge's active function in small-claim cases and in suits without counsel, 3.The judge's function in the litigation with counsele, IV.The trend toward an increase in the number and power of special tribunals and the future of civil procedure

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

I.General observations, 1.The active functions of judges in several kinds of proceedings, 2.The historic change of the judge's functions in civil procedure, (a).Prewar civil procedure and its practice, (b).The postwar civil procedure reform and its practice, II.The active functions of judges in the process of litigation, 1.The court's power to check the complaint filed and to control commencement of action, 2.The court's power to control the claim, 3.The court's power to control the pleadings, 4.The court's power to control proof-taking, 5.The court's functions in developing the process, 6.The court's power to encourage to a "compromise", III.Some problems surrounding the active role of judges, 1.The active exercise of the judge's function in the social and economic climate of postwar Japan. 2.The judge's active function in small-claim cases and in suits without counsel, 3.The judge's function in the litigation with counsele, IV.The trend toward an increase in the number and power of special tribunals and the future of civil procedure

Key concepts: Civil litigation, Political science, Law, Civil procedure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Active Role of the Judge in Japanese Civil Litigation — Research Paper | ScholarLens