1995•Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)Open access

The Jurisdiction Element of 18 U.S.C. § 844(i): A Federal Criminal Commerce Clause Statute

Thomas J. Egan

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Historically, the Supreme Court has adopted a passive role in reviewing those federal criminal statutes enacted under the commerce power.3 In May 1995, however, the Supreme Court, in United States v. Lopez, 4 overturned a criminal Commerce Clause 5 statute as beyond the reach of congressional authority.The abrupt change of stance 6 and the slim majority 7 makes Lopez's ramifications uncertain.8 In addition, the bold holding draws attention away from a pivotal, yet more subtle debate over federal criminal Commerce Clause jurisdiction, which has been brewing for a quarter century.9 This debate may prove to be another avenue of assault on the previously unassailable Commerce Power. See

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Historically, the Supreme Court has adopted a passive role in reviewing those federal criminal statutes enacted under the commerce power.3 In May 1995, however, the Supreme Court, in United States v. Lopez, 4 overturned a criminal Commerce Clause 5 statute as beyond the reach of congressional authority.The abrupt change of stance 6 and the slim majority 7 makes Lopez's ramifications uncertain.8 In addition, the bold holding draws attention away from a pivotal, yet more subtle debate over federal criminal Commerce Clause jurisdiction, which has been brewing for a quarter century.9 This debate may prove to be another avenue of assault on the previously unassailable Commerce Power. See

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Historically, the Supreme Court has adopted a passive role in reviewing those federal criminal statutes enacted under the commerce power.3 In May 1995, however, the Supreme Court, in United States v. Lopez, 4 overturned a criminal Commerce Clause 5 statute as beyond the reach of congressional authority.The abrupt change of stance 6 and the slim majority 7 makes Lopez's ramifications uncertain.8 In addition, the bold holding draws attention away from a pivotal, yet more subtle debate over federal criminal Commerce Clause jurisdiction, which has been brewing for a quarter century.9 This debate may prove to be another avenue of assault on the previously unassailable Commerce Power. See

Key concepts: Statute, Criminal jurisdiction, Law, Element (criminal law), Jurisdiction, Commerce Clause, Political science, Federal jurisdiction

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Jurisdiction Element of 18 U.S.C. § 844(i): A Federal Criminal Commerce Clause Statute — Research Paper | ScholarLens