2013PubMedRequires access

[The necessity of post-maneuver postural restriction in treating benign paroxysmal positional vertigo].

Jianping Jia, Delong Chang, Song Dai, Yuehong Sang, Xuhui Tai, Xiaohui Sun, Yue Hou, Wei Zhang

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the necessity of postural restrictions after repositioning maneuvers in posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). METHOD: Sixty-eight consecutive patients diagnosed of posterior canal BPPV with a positive Dix-Hallpike test. Thirty-two patients were instructed to follow postural restrictions after repositioning maneuvers, and 36 patients did not receive any postural restriction after treatment. All the patients were reevaluated at 1 week and 3 months later respectively. RESULT: There was no statistical difference in number of maneuvers needed to resolve symptoms between two groups. CONCLUSION: Epley maneuver is effective to treat patients with posterior canal BPPV, and postural restrictions does not improved the efficacy. Above all, we do not recommend any postural restrictions to patients with posterior canal BPPV.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the necessity of postural restrictions after repositioning maneuvers in posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). METHOD: Sixty-eight consecutive patients diagnosed of posterior canal BPPV with a positive Dix-Hallpike test. Thirty-two patients were instructed to follow postural restrictions after repositioning maneuvers, and 36 patients did not receive any postural restriction after treatment. All the patients were reevaluated at 1 week and 3 months later respectively. RESULT: There was no statistical difference in number of maneuvers needed to resolve symptoms between two groups. CONCLUSION: Epley maneuver is effective to treat patients with posterior canal BPPV, and postural restrictions does not improved the efficacy. Above all, we do not recommend any postural restrictions to patients with posterior canal BPPV.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the necessity of postural restrictions after repositioning maneuvers in posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). METHOD: Sixty-eight consecutive patients diagnosed of posterior canal BPPV with a positive Dix-Hallpike test. Thirty-two patients were instructed to follow postural restrictions after repositioning maneuvers, and 36 patients did not receive any postural restriction after treatment. All the patients were reevaluated at 1 week and 3 months later respectively. RESULT: There was no statistical difference in number of maneuvers needed to resolve symptoms between two groups. CONCLUSION: Epley maneuver is effective to treat patients with posterior canal BPPV, and postural restrictions does not improved the efficacy. Above all, we do not recommend any postural restrictions to patients with posterior canal BPPV.

Key concepts: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, Posterior Semicircular Canal, Medicine, Vertigo, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Physical therapy, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[The necessity of post-maneuver postural restriction in treating benign paroxysmal positional vertigo]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens