2005Unpublished venueRequires access

(2012) Quine's and Carnap's conceptions of explication

Martin Gustafsson

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Lecture in Bergen 2012, Oct. 17. This paper clarifies Quine’s conception of explication and identifies its place in his overall view of the aims and methods of philosophy. It does so by way of comparing his conception with Carnap’s, Carnap being the philosopher from whom Quine got the notion of explication to begin with. In contravention of Quine’s own suggestion, and against the view of some commentators, it is argued that Quine’s and Carnap’s conceptions are importantly different, especially with regard to how explication can help us dissolve verbal philosophical confusions and disputes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Lecture in Bergen 2012, Oct. 17. This paper clarifies Quine’s conception of explication and identifies its place in his overall view of the aims and methods of philosophy. It does so by way of comparing his conception with Carnap’s, Carnap being the philosopher from whom Quine got the notion of explication to begin with. In contravention of Quine’s own suggestion, and against the view of some commentators, it is argued that Quine’s and Carnap’s conceptions are importantly different, especially with regard to how explication can help us dissolve verbal philosophical confusions and disputes.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Lecture in Bergen 2012, Oct. 17. This paper clarifies Quine’s conception of explication and identifies its place in his overall view of the aims and methods of philosophy. It does so by way of comparing his conception with Carnap’s, Carnap being the philosopher from whom Quine got the notion of explication to begin with. In contravention of Quine’s own suggestion, and against the view of some commentators, it is argued that Quine’s and Carnap’s conceptions are importantly different, especially with regard to how explication can help us dissolve verbal philosophical confusions and disputes.

Key concepts: Explication, Quine, Epistemology, Philosophy, Philosophy of science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
(2012) Quine's and Carnap's conceptions of explication — Research Paper | ScholarLens