(2012) Quine's and Carnap's conceptions of explication
Martin Gustafsson
Abstract
Martin Gustafsson
Abstract
Lecture in Bergen 2012, Oct. 17. This paper clarifies Quine’s conception of explication and identifies its place in his overall view of the aims and methods of philosophy. It does so by way of comparing his conception with Carnap’s, Carnap being the philosopher from whom Quine got the notion of explication to begin with. In contravention of Quine’s own suggestion, and against the view of some commentators, it is argued that Quine’s and Carnap’s conceptions are importantly different, especially with regard to how explication can help us dissolve verbal philosophical confusions and disputes.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Lecture in Bergen 2012, Oct. 17. This paper clarifies Quine’s conception of explication and identifies its place in his overall view of the aims and methods of philosophy. It does so by way of comparing his conception with Carnap’s, Carnap being the philosopher from whom Quine got the notion of explication to begin with. In contravention of Quine’s own suggestion, and against the view of some commentators, it is argued that Quine’s and Carnap’s conceptions are importantly different, especially with regard to how explication can help us dissolve verbal philosophical confusions and disputes.
Key concepts: Explication, Quine, Epistemology, Philosophy, Philosophy of science