2009•Indian Journal of EntomologyRequires access

Role of Light and Pheromone Traps in the Management of Bollworms in Cotton Ecosystem

Ponnuraj Jeyakumar, M.C. Jat, Amar Singh, Dilip Monga

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to study the interaction effect of light and pheromone traps in catching the adult moths of all the three bollworms (American bollworm-Helicoverpa armigera; Spotted bollworm-Earias spp.; Pink bollworm-Pectinophora gossypiella) during cotton season 2002 and 2004. In general, light traps were more effective than pheromone traps at times of high population pressure (2002) of American and spotted bollworm. However, at times of low abundance of both American and spotted bollworm, i.e. during 2004, it was found that the pheromone traps (3.76 and 5.82 adults/trap/3 nights respectively) were significantly more effective in trapping adults than light trap (3.20 and 3.34 adults/trap/3 nights respectively). When both light and pheromone traps were placed in the same vicinity, the pheromone trap catches of American bollworm (2.46 adults/trap/3nights) were affected more significantly by light traps (4.01 adults/trap/3nights). However, no adverse effect was noticed in case of pheromone trap catches of spotted bollworm. In case of pink bollworm, being a non noctuid, was not attracted towards light trap (1.00–1.94 adults/trap/3nights).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An experiment was conducted to study the interaction effect of light and pheromone traps in catching the adult moths of all the three bollworms (American bollworm-Helicoverpa armigera; Spotted bollworm-Earias spp.; Pink bollworm-Pectinophora gossypiella) during cotton season 2002 and 2004. In general, light traps were more effective than pheromone traps at times of high population pressure (2002) of American and spotted bollworm. However, at times of low abundance of both American and spotted bollworm, i.e. during 2004, it was found that the pheromone traps (3.76 and 5.82 adults/trap/3 nights respectively) were significantly more effective in trapping adults than light trap (3.20 and 3.34 adults/trap/3 nights respectively). When both light and pheromone traps were placed in the same vicinity, the pheromone trap catches of American bollworm (2.46 adults/trap/3nights) were affected more significantly by light traps (4.01 adults/trap/3nights). However, no adverse effect was noticed in case of pheromone trap catches of spotted bollworm. In case of pink bollworm, being a non noctuid, was not attracted towards light trap (1.00–1.94 adults/trap/3nights).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An experiment was conducted to study the interaction effect of light and pheromone traps in catching the adult moths of all the three bollworms (American bollworm-Helicoverpa armigera; Spotted bollworm-Earias spp.; Pink bollworm-Pectinophora gossypiella) during cotton season 2002 and 2004. In general, light traps were more effective than pheromone traps at times of high population pressure (2002) of American and spotted bollworm. However, at times of low abundance of both American and spotted bollworm, i.e. during 2004, it was found that the pheromone traps (3.76 and 5.82 adults/trap/3 nights respectively) were significantly more effective in trapping adults than light trap (3.20 and 3.34 adults/trap/3 nights respectively). When both light and pheromone traps were placed in the same vicinity, the pheromone trap catches of American bollworm (2.46 adults/trap/3nights) were affected more significantly by light traps (4.01 adults/trap/3nights). However, no adverse effect was noticed in case of pheromone trap catches of spotted bollworm. In case of pink bollworm, being a non noctuid, was not attracted towards light trap (1.00–1.94 adults/trap/3nights).

Key concepts: Pink bollworm, Pheromone trap, Biology, Pheromone, Helicoverpa armigera, Helicoverpa, Trapping, Bollworm

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Role of Light and Pheromone Traps in the Management of Bollworms in Cotton Ecosystem — Research Paper | ScholarLens