1982Fordham international law journalRequires access

Persecution Abroad as Grounds for Withholding Deportation: The Standard of Proof and the Role of the Courts

Smith, A Edward

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The immigration laws of the United States have long recognized a policy against deporting a person who seeks refuge in the United States, when it appears that person would be subject to persecution following deportation. The Immigration Act of 1952 permitted the Immigration and Naturalization Service to withhold the deportation of any person who could show that he would suffer persecution in the nation to which he would be deported. A similar provision is contained in the UN Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees. The INS and the courts, having ruled that “no real conflict” existed between the Protocol and the Immigration Act, continued to adhere to to the latter without ever examining the significance of fundamental discrepancies. PERSECUTION ABROAD AS GROUNDS FOR WITHHOLDING DEPORTATION: THE STANDARD OF PROOF AND THE ROLE OF THE COURTS

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The immigration laws of the United States have long recognized a policy against deporting a person who seeks refuge in the United States, when it appears that person would be subject to persecution following deportation. The Immigration Act of 1952 permitted the Immigration and Naturalization Service to withhold the deportation of any person who could show that he would suffer persecution in the nation to which he would be deported. A similar provision is contained in the UN Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees. The INS and the courts, having ruled that “no real conflict” existed between the Protocol and the Immigration Act, continued to adhere to to the latter without ever examining the significance of fundamental discrepancies. PERSECUTION ABROAD AS GROUNDS FOR WITHHOLDING DEPORTATION: THE STANDARD OF PROOF AND THE ROLE OF THE COURTS

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The immigration laws of the United States have long recognized a policy against deporting a person who seeks refuge in the United States, when it appears that person would be subject to persecution following deportation. The Immigration Act of 1952 permitted the Immigration and Naturalization Service to withhold the deportation of any person who could show that he would suffer persecution in the nation to which he would be deported. A similar provision is contained in the UN Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees. The INS and the courts, having ruled that “no real conflict” existed between the Protocol and the Immigration Act, continued to adhere to to the latter without ever examining the significance of fundamental discrepancies. PERSECUTION ABROAD AS GROUNDS FOR WITHHOLDING DEPORTATION: THE STANDARD OF PROOF AND THE ROLE OF THE COURTS

Key concepts: Deportation, Persecution, Naturalization, Immigration, Political science, Refugee, Law, Immigration law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Persecution Abroad as Grounds for Withholding Deportation: The Standard of Proof and the Role of the Courts — Research Paper | ScholarLens