2013•DergiPark (Istanbul University)Open access

İstatistiksel Düşünme Modellerinin İncelenmesi

Timur Koparan

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Statistical thinking has gained importance recently. The purpose of the research study is to analyze terms associated with statistical thinking, statistical thinking models, and to examine differences among statistical thinking models. These models have been developed by researchers in order to identify species of statistical thinking and how the students solved problems. In addition, these models provide the material for educational research. In this study, five statistical thinking models are discussed compared by considering different aspects of these models. These statistical models are Ben-Zvi and Friedlander (1997), Wild and Pfannkuch (1999), Jones et al (2000), Hoerl and Snee (2001) and Mooney (2002). This study provides researchbased knowledge that can be used by teachers and researchers to inform statistical thinking. If these models are known by teachers and researchers, they can be useful for overcoming the difficulties encountered in the teaching of statistics.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Statistical thinking has gained importance recently. The purpose of the research study is to analyze terms associated with statistical thinking, statistical thinking models, and to examine differences among statistical thinking models. These models have been developed by researchers in order to identify species of statistical thinking and how the students solved problems. In addition, these models provide the material for educational research. In this study, five statistical thinking models are discussed compared by considering different aspects of these models. These statistical models are Ben-Zvi and Friedlander (1997), Wild and Pfannkuch (1999), Jones et al (2000), Hoerl and Snee (2001) and Mooney (2002). This study provides researchbased knowledge that can be used by teachers and researchers to inform statistical thinking. If these models are known by teachers and researchers, they can be useful for overcoming the difficulties encountered in the teaching of statistics.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Statistical thinking has gained importance recently. The purpose of the research study is to analyze terms associated with statistical thinking, statistical thinking models, and to examine differences among statistical thinking models. These models have been developed by researchers in order to identify species of statistical thinking and how the students solved problems. In addition, these models provide the material for educational research. In this study, five statistical thinking models are discussed compared by considering different aspects of these models. These statistical models are Ben-Zvi and Friedlander (1997), Wild and Pfannkuch (1999), Jones et al (2000), Hoerl and Snee (2001) and Mooney (2002). This study provides researchbased knowledge that can be used by teachers and researchers to inform statistical thinking. If these models are known by teachers and researchers, they can be useful for overcoming the difficulties encountered in the teaching of statistics.

Key concepts: Statistical thinking, Statistical analysis, Statistical model, Mathematics education, Psychology, Computer science, Mathematics, Statistics

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
İstatistiksel Düşünme Modellerinin İncelenmesi — Research Paper | ScholarLens