2012•Journal of Mental Health of Thailand - วารสารสุขภาพจิต แห่งประเทศไทยRequires access

Comparison of zuclopenthixol accuphase, haloperidol and diazepam in alcohol withdrawal symptoms

A Patarakorn

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy of zuclopenthixol accuphase, haloperidol and diazepam for alcohol withdrawal symptoms (AWS). Materials and  methods This retrospective study was performed in 90 selected in-patient cases admitted to Thanyarak Institute from 1 February till 30 April 2007. There were 3 groups of treatments i.e. group-1 was received diazepam intravenous alone; group-2 received zuclopenthixol accuphase intramuscular add-on diazepam intravenous and group-3 received haloperidol intramuscular add-on diazepam intra-venous.  CIWA-ar was applied to assess AWS, the amount of diazepam, number of the day receiving each drug and adverse effects of the treatment were monitored. Means, percentage were analyzed.  Monitoring scale was compared by ANOVA and Chi square tests. Results Almost were male patients at average age of 46 years old. The severity of AWS was at moderate level.  Zuclopenthixol acuphase add-on diazepam treatment could calm patients more effective than diazepam alone and the amount of diazepam was less significantly.  However when compared with the group of haloperidol add-on diazepam, the results were comparable but it had less adverse effects. Conclusion Zuclopenthixol accuphase intramuscular add-on diazepam intra-venous provided better result in treatment of AWS than diazepam alone and its adverse effects were less than that of haloperidol though the efficacy was comparable.  However further well designed study should be carried out.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the efficacy of zuclopenthixol accuphase, haloperidol and diazepam for alcohol withdrawal symptoms (AWS). Materials and  methods This retrospective study was performed in 90 selected in-patient cases admitted to Thanyarak Institute from 1 February till 30 April 2007. There were 3 groups of treatments i.e. group-1 was received diazepam intravenous alone; group-2 received zuclopenthixol accuphase intramuscular add-on diazepam intravenous and group-3 received haloperidol intramuscular add-on diazepam intra-venous.  CIWA-ar was applied to assess AWS, the amount of diazepam, number of the day receiving each drug and adverse effects of the treatment were monitored. Means, percentage were analyzed.  Monitoring scale was compared by ANOVA and Chi square tests. Results Almost were male patients at average age of 46 years old. The severity of AWS was at moderate level.  Zuclopenthixol acuphase add-on diazepam treatment could calm patients more effective than diazepam alone and the amount of diazepam was less significantly.  However when compared with the group of haloperidol add-on diazepam, the results were comparable but it had less adverse effects. Conclusion Zuclopenthixol accuphase intramuscular add-on diazepam intra-venous provided better result in treatment of AWS than diazepam alone and its adverse effects were less than that of haloperidol though the efficacy was comparable.  However further well designed study should be carried out.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy of zuclopenthixol accuphase, haloperidol and diazepam for alcohol withdrawal symptoms (AWS). Materials and  methods This retrospective study was performed in 90 selected in-patient cases admitted to Thanyarak Institute from 1 February till 30 April 2007. There were 3 groups of treatments i.e. group-1 was received diazepam intravenous alone; group-2 received zuclopenthixol accuphase intramuscular add-on diazepam intravenous and group-3 received haloperidol intramuscular add-on diazepam intra-venous.  CIWA-ar was applied to assess AWS, the amount of diazepam, number of the day receiving each drug and adverse effects of the treatment were monitored. Means, percentage were analyzed.  Monitoring scale was compared by ANOVA and Chi square tests. Results Almost were male patients at average age of 46 years old. The severity of AWS was at moderate level.  Zuclopenthixol acuphase add-on diazepam treatment could calm patients more effective than diazepam alone and the amount of diazepam was less significantly.  However when compared with the group of haloperidol add-on diazepam, the results were comparable but it had less adverse effects. Conclusion Zuclopenthixol accuphase intramuscular add-on diazepam intra-venous provided better result in treatment of AWS than diazepam alone and its adverse effects were less than that of haloperidol though the efficacy was comparable.  However further well designed study should be carried out.

Key concepts: Diazepam, Haloperidol, Medicine, Anesthesia, Adverse effect, Internal medicine, Dopamine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of zuclopenthixol accuphase, haloperidol and diazepam in alcohol withdrawal symptoms — Research Paper | ScholarLens