2011Geophysical Research LettersOpen access

A comparison of ARTEMIS observations and particle‐in‐cell modeling of the lunar photoelectron sheath in the terrestrial magnetotail

A. R. Poppe, J. S. Halekas, G. T. Delory, W. M. Farrell, V. Angelopoulos, J. P. McFadden, J. W. Bonnell, R. E. Ergun

Open full text 31 citations

Abstract

As an airless body in space with no global magnetic field, the Moon is exposed to both solar ultraviolet radiation and ambient plasmas. Photoemission from solar UV radiation and collection of ambient plasma are typically opposing charging currents and simple charging current balance predicts that the lunar dayside surface should charge positively; however, the two ARTEMIS probes have observed energy‐dependent loss cones and high‐energy, surface‐originating electron beams above the dayside lunar surface for extended periods in the magnetosphere, which are indicative of negative surface potentials. In this paper, we compare observations by the ARTEMIS P1 spacecraft with a one‐dimensional particle‐in‐cell simulation and show that the energy‐dependent loss cones and electron beams are due to the presence of stable, non‐monotonic, negative potentials above the lunar surface. The simulations also show that while the magnitude of the non‐monotonic potential is mainly driven by the incoming electron temperature, the incoming ion temperature can alter this magnitude, especially for periods in the plasma sheet when the ion temperature is more than twenty times the electron temperature. Finally, we note several other plasma phenomena associated with these non‐monotonic potentials, such as broadband electrostatic noise and electron cyclotron harmonic emissions, and offer possible generation mechanisms for these phenomena.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As an airless body in space with no global magnetic field, the Moon is exposed to both solar ultraviolet radiation and ambient plasmas. Photoemission from solar UV radiation and collection of ambient plasma are typically opposing charging currents and simple charging current balance predicts that the lunar dayside surface should charge positively; however, the two ARTEMIS probes have observed energy‐dependent loss cones and high‐energy, surface‐originating electron beams above the dayside lunar surface for extended periods in the magnetosphere, which are indicative of negative surface potentials. In this paper, we compare observations by the ARTEMIS P1 spacecraft with a one‐dimensional particle‐in‐cell simulation and show that the energy‐dependent loss cones and electron beams are due to the presence of stable, non‐monotonic, negative potentials above the lunar surface. The simulations also show that while the magnitude of the non‐monotonic potential is mainly driven by the incoming electron temperature, the incoming ion temperature can alter this magnitude, especially for periods in the plasma sheet when the ion temperature is more than twenty times the electron temperature. Finally, we note several other plasma phenomena associated with these non‐monotonic potentials, such as broadband electrostatic noise and electron cyclotron harmonic emissions, and offer possible generation mechanisms for these phenomena.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 31 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As an airless body in space with no global magnetic field, the Moon is exposed to both solar ultraviolet radiation and ambient plasmas. Photoemission from solar UV radiation and collection of ambient plasma are typically opposing charging currents and simple charging current balance predicts that the lunar dayside surface should charge positively; however, the two ARTEMIS probes have observed energy‐dependent loss cones and high‐energy, surface‐originating electron beams above the dayside lunar surface for extended periods in the magnetosphere, which are indicative of negative surface potentials. In this paper, we compare observations by the ARTEMIS P1 spacecraft with a one‐dimensional particle‐in‐cell simulation and show that the energy‐dependent loss cones and electron beams are due to the presence of stable, non‐monotonic, negative potentials above the lunar surface. The simulations also show that while the magnitude of the non‐monotonic potential is mainly driven by the incoming electron temperature, the incoming ion temperature can alter this magnitude, especially for periods in the plasma sheet when the ion temperature is more than twenty times the electron temperature. Finally, we note several other plasma phenomena associated with these non‐monotonic potentials, such as broadband electrostatic noise and electron cyclotron harmonic emissions, and offer possible generation mechanisms for these phenomena.

Key concepts: Plasma sheet, Plasma, Electron, Physics, Computational physics, Atomic physics, Spacecraft charging, Magnetosphere

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparison of ARTEMIS observations and particle‐in‐cell modeling of the lunar photoelectron sheath in the terrestrial magnetotail — Research Paper | ScholarLens