1984•Journal of Clinical MicrobiologyOpen access

Comparative laboratory evaluation of three antigen detection methods for diagnosis of Haemophilus influenzae type b disease

Mario J. Marcon, Ayser C. Hamoudi, Harold J. Cannon

Open full text 42 citations

Abstract

Cerebrospinal fluid, urine, serum, and other body fluid specimens from pediatric patients with systemic disease were tested with Bactigen latex agglutination (555 specimens), Phadebact coagglutination (319 specimens), and counterimmunoelectrophoresis (335 specimens) for the presence of Haemophilus influenzae type b antigen. All three methods showed good sensitivity for detecting antigen in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with culture-positive meningitis (greater than or equal to 86% sensitivity). However, coagglutination and counterimmunoelectrophoresis were much less sensitive (less than or equal to 40%) than latex agglutination (96%) for detecting antigen in other body fluid specimens in culture-positive, nonmeningeal H. influenzae disease. Bactigen latex agglutination was also more sensitive than the other procedures for detecting antigen in specimens from patients with culture-negative, presumed H. influenzae disease. Comparative testing of fluids spiked with known quantities of purified H. influenzae b polyribosephosphate capsular polysaccharide revealed an apparent 100-fold greater sensitivity with Bactigen as compared with the other two methods. Although all three methods showed good specificity (greater than 98%), both agglutination methods gave a few false-positive results. In a clinical setting where both meningeal and nonmeningeal H. influenzae b disease are encountered frequently, Bactigen latex agglutination appears to be superior to coagglutination and counterimmunoelectrophoresis for detecting antigen in body fluids.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Cerebrospinal fluid, urine, serum, and other body fluid specimens from pediatric patients with systemic disease were tested with Bactigen latex agglutination (555 specimens), Phadebact coagglutination (319 specimens), and counterimmunoelectrophoresis (335 specimens) for the presence of Haemophilus influenzae type b antigen. All three methods showed good sensitivity for detecting antigen in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with culture-positive meningitis (greater than or equal to 86% sensitivity). However, coagglutination and counterimmunoelectrophoresis were much less sensitive (less than or equal to 40%) than latex agglutination (96%) for detecting antigen in other body fluid specimens in culture-positive, nonmeningeal H. influenzae disease. Bactigen latex agglutination was also more sensitive than the other procedures for detecting antigen in specimens from patients with culture-negative, presumed H. influenzae disease. Comparative testing of fluids spiked with known quantities of purified H. influenzae b polyribosephosphate capsular polysaccharide revealed an apparent 100-fold greater sensitivity with Bactigen as compared with the other two methods. Although all three methods showed good specificity (greater than 98%), both agglutination methods gave a few false-positive results. In a clinical setting where both meningeal and nonmeningeal H. influenzae b disease are encountered frequently, Bactigen latex agglutination appears to be superior to coagglutination and counterimmunoelectrophoresis for detecting antigen in body fluids.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 42 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Cerebrospinal fluid, urine, serum, and other body fluid specimens from pediatric patients with systemic disease were tested with Bactigen latex agglutination (555 specimens), Phadebact coagglutination (319 specimens), and counterimmunoelectrophoresis (335 specimens) for the presence of Haemophilus influenzae type b antigen. All three methods showed good sensitivity for detecting antigen in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with culture-positive meningitis (greater than or equal to 86% sensitivity). However, coagglutination and counterimmunoelectrophoresis were much less sensitive (less than or equal to 40%) than latex agglutination (96%) for detecting antigen in other body fluid specimens in culture-positive, nonmeningeal H. influenzae disease. Bactigen latex agglutination was also more sensitive than the other procedures for detecting antigen in specimens from patients with culture-negative, presumed H. influenzae disease. Comparative testing of fluids spiked with known quantities of purified H. influenzae b polyribosephosphate capsular polysaccharide revealed an apparent 100-fold greater sensitivity with Bactigen as compared with the other two methods. Although all three methods showed good specificity (greater than 98%), both agglutination methods gave a few false-positive results. In a clinical setting where both meningeal and nonmeningeal H. influenzae b disease are encountered frequently, Bactigen latex agglutination appears to be superior to coagglutination and counterimmunoelectrophoresis for detecting antigen in body fluids.

Key concepts: Counterimmunoelectrophoresis, Latex fixation test, Antigen, Microbiology, Agglutination (biology), Meningitis, Haemophilus, Haemophilus influenzae

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative laboratory evaluation of three antigen detection methods for diagnosis of Haemophilus influenzae type b disease — Research Paper | ScholarLens