1980Infection and ImmunityOpen access

Immunotherapy of experimental cancer by intralesional injection of emulsified nonliving mycobacteria: comparison of Mycobacterium bovis (BCG), Mycobacterium phlei, and Mycobacterium smegmatis

E Yarkoni, H. J. Rapp

Open full text 13 citations

Abstract

Mycobacterium bovis (BCG), Mycobacterium phlei, and Mycobacterium smegmatis were each tested in emulsified form for their potency to cause regression of transplants of a syngeneic murine fibrosarcoma and of a syngeneic guinea pig hepatoma. On a weight basis, M. phlei and M. smegmatis were as effective as BCG in causing tumor regression. M. phlei and M. smegmatis were comparable to BCG in provoking delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions in guinea pigs sensitized to M. phlei or M. smegmatis. In BCG-sensitized guinea pigs, M. phlei and M. smegmatis provoked weaker delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions than did BCG. Purified protein derivative of M. tuberculosis was more active in eliciting delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity in BCG-sensitized guinea pigs than in animals sensitized with M. phlei or M. smegmatis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Mycobacterium bovis (BCG), Mycobacterium phlei, and Mycobacterium smegmatis were each tested in emulsified form for their potency to cause regression of transplants of a syngeneic murine fibrosarcoma and of a syngeneic guinea pig hepatoma. On a weight basis, M. phlei and M. smegmatis were as effective as BCG in causing tumor regression. M. phlei and M. smegmatis were comparable to BCG in provoking delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions in guinea pigs sensitized to M. phlei or M. smegmatis. In BCG-sensitized guinea pigs, M. phlei and M. smegmatis provoked weaker delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions than did BCG. Purified protein derivative of M. tuberculosis was more active in eliciting delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity in BCG-sensitized guinea pigs than in animals sensitized with M. phlei or M. smegmatis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Mycobacterium bovis (BCG), Mycobacterium phlei, and Mycobacterium smegmatis were each tested in emulsified form for their potency to cause regression of transplants of a syngeneic murine fibrosarcoma and of a syngeneic guinea pig hepatoma. On a weight basis, M. phlei and M. smegmatis were as effective as BCG in causing tumor regression. M. phlei and M. smegmatis were comparable to BCG in provoking delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions in guinea pigs sensitized to M. phlei or M. smegmatis. In BCG-sensitized guinea pigs, M. phlei and M. smegmatis provoked weaker delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions than did BCG. Purified protein derivative of M. tuberculosis was more active in eliciting delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity in BCG-sensitized guinea pigs than in animals sensitized with M. phlei or M. smegmatis.

Key concepts: Mycobacterium phlei, Mycobacterium smegmatis, Mycobacterium bovis, Microbiology, Mycobacterium, Biology, Delayed hypersensitivity, Mycobacterium chelonae

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Immunotherapy of experimental cancer by intralesional injection of emulsified nonliving mycobacteria: comparison of Mycobacterium bovis (BCG), Mycobacterium phlei, and Mycobacterium smegmatis — Research Paper | ScholarLens