2015New Directions for Community CollegesRequires access

Faculty Members’ Perceptions of Rigor in Dual Enrollment, Accelerated Programs, and Standard Community College Courses

Colin Ferguson, Pete Baker, Dana Burnett

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

This chapter presents the results of a study that investigated faculty members’ views on the level of academic rigor in three settings at one community college: dual enrollment, accelerated programs, and standard community college courses.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter presents the results of a study that investigated faculty members’ views on the level of academic rigor in three settings at one community college: dual enrollment, accelerated programs, and standard community college courses.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter presents the results of a study that investigated faculty members’ views on the level of academic rigor in three settings at one community college: dual enrollment, accelerated programs, and standard community college courses.

Key concepts: Community college, Dual enrollment, Medical education, Dual (grammatical number), Perception, Psychology, Higher education, Academic standards

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Faculty Members’ Perceptions of Rigor in Dual Enrollment, Accelerated Programs, and Standard Community College Courses — Research Paper | ScholarLens