Comparison of ET measured with neutron moisture meters and weighing lysimeters
James L. Wright
Abstract
Open-access reader
James L. Wright
Abstract
Open-access reader
The neutron moisture meter (N.M.) method of determining crop water use is\nfrequently used in research and irrigated agriculture. This study was conducted to\ncompare crop evapotranspiration (ET) estimated by the N.M. method with ET measured\nwith a weighing lysimeter. Neutron meter data were obtained in a furrow-irrigated field\nof alfalfa (Medicago sativa L) equipped with a weighing lysimeter and in alfalfa plots\nirrigated with a line-source sprinkler system. Seasonal ET estimated from the N.M. data\nfor the furrow irrigation treatment was 15% less than lysimeter ET when only a 2-m soil\nprofile was considered, and was 10% less than lysimeter ET for a 3-m profile. The\nseasonal ET estimated from N.M. data for the sprinkler treatment with a dry subsoil layer\nwas within 2.5% of lysimeter ET. The N.M. method lacked capability of measuring root\nextraction of water from the relatively wet, lower soil layers which existed with furrow\nirrigation.
OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The neutron moisture meter (N.M.) method of determining crop water use is\nfrequently used in research and irrigated agriculture. This study was conducted to\ncompare crop evapotranspiration (ET) estimated by the N.M. method with ET measured\nwith a weighing lysimeter. Neutron meter data were obtained in a furrow-irrigated field\nof alfalfa (Medicago sativa L) equipped with a weighing lysimeter and in alfalfa plots\nirrigated with a line-source sprinkler system. Seasonal ET estimated from the N.M. data\nfor the furrow irrigation treatment was 15% less than lysimeter ET when only a 2-m soil\nprofile was considered, and was 10% less than lysimeter ET for a 3-m profile. The\nseasonal ET estimated from N.M. data for the sprinkler treatment with a dry subsoil layer\nwas within 2.5% of lysimeter ET. The N.M. method lacked capability of measuring root\nextraction of water from the relatively wet, lower soil layers which existed with furrow\nirrigation.
Key concepts: Lysimeter, Neutron probe, Environmental science, Evapotranspiration, Water content, Subsoil, Irrigation, Hydrology (agriculture)